UBL Naming and Design Rules SC

RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Elements vs. attributes: discussion kickoff

  • 1.  RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Elements vs. attributes: discussion kickoff

    Posted 02-04-2002 06:42
     MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    ubl-ndrsc message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


    Subject: RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Elements vs. attributes: discussion kickoff


    Title: Message
    Folks,
     
    I tend to agree. The only real use I can see for attributes of any kind is for genuine meta-data as eluded by Matt. I prefer the use of attributes in schema when ever possible as I find it much easier to map the elements to databases that need to store the data contained the UBL instance documents. It certainly makes life easier and less confusing. What we should be specifying then are the particular instances when to use attributes, rather than creating a rule that satisfies an 80/20 situation, i.e.: ID, IDREF and xml:Lang as espoused by Mark.
     
    John Dumay