MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















office message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [office] Proposal: Page Sequences




From: Daniel Vogelheim <Daniel.Vogelheim@sun.com>
To: office@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 12:20:40 +0100






Hi all,

Michael alerted me that my example was a bit garbled. It doesn't declare 
master-pages anywhere, and also doesn't use the new element name, 
page-layout. Here's a corrected example, also with updated attribute names:

<style:automatic-style>
 <style:page-layout name="pm1"> <!-- portrait page --> </style:page-layout>
 <style:page-layout name="pm2"> <!-- landscape page --> 
</style:page-layout>
</style:automatic-style>
<style:master-styles>
 <style:master-page name="portrait" style:page-layout-name="pm1"/>
 <style:master-page name="landscape" style:page-layout-name="pm2"/>
</style:master-styles>
<office:body>
 <text:page-sequence>
   <text:page text:master-page-name="portrait"/>
   <text:page text:master-page-name="portrait"/>
   <text:page text:master-page-name="landscape"/>
   <text:page text:master-page-name="landscape"/>
   <text:page text:master-page-name="portrait"/>
 </text:page-sequence>
[... text boxes as before ...]


An additional item came up, too: In the proposal I specified that, if a 
main text flow is present and thus conflicting master page infos are 
present, the page sequence should take precedence. It might make more 
sense to specify the page sequence as an alternative to a main text 
flow, so that a document would contain either a text flow or a page 
sequence. This way, no conflicting information would be in the file, and 
therefore no precedence is needed.


Sincerely,
Daniel









References:

Proposal: Page Sequences
From: Daniel Vogelheim <Daniel.Vogelheim@sun.com>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]