Thanks David,
I've downloaded the slides and I will look them
over. I suspect that this approach will aid
uptake.
However, I am not a co-chair of this effort, so I
am copying this to Sukumar Dwrkanath with the
suggestion that he consider it.
Sukumar, sorry for the duplication, but I thought
it wiser to make that duplication a way to draw
your attention to this.
I have signed up to edit the spec, and I have
already expressed the thought that we may want to
include a few examples to clarify the
distinctions among the particular profiles.
Providing a sample for how to use CAM to verify
conformance with the conformance section(s) we
include in the specification(s) strikes me as a
tool that the NIMS Support Center might want to
investigate, in addition to the TC's Adoption SC.
I have long been inclined to the view that
thinking about how a specification will be
implemented is important.
Best Wishes to All,
Rex
At 9:55 AM -0700 12/24/08, David RR Webber \(XML\) wrote:
>Rex,
>
>In the spirit of gift giving - I'm trying to
>play catchup here - I looked quickly at the
>IPAWS profile worksheet.
>
>Seems to me this is perfect example for the use
>of CAM templates - to refine the use model to
>match each CAP profile desired. Then use the
>CAM template to generate mini-IEPDs for each -
>this fits with the NIEM approach.
>
>Making the NIEM IEPD from the XSD + CAM template
>was the subject of my talk at XML2008 - and I
>used the EDXL HAVE as the example.
>
>The slides for that are here:
>