Hi Michael,
If you do not create either an overview document or combine into a single document, then you do not have a single specification and it will require 3 separate ballots.
Mary
On May 12, 2010, at 2:19 AM, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg wrote:
> Hi Mary,
>
> On 05/11/10 20:29, Mary McRae wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>> I think we've only sent 2 parts out for public review so far: Part I and Part 3. I don't believe Part 2 has been submitted for public review yet. That really doesn't matter though, if you're in effect creating a new document.
>
> That's true. Part 2 has not been send out for public review.
>> Will you be merging into a single, comprehensive document? Or will you be creating an overview document that then ties together the 3 parts?
>
> The three parts will remain separate documents. There is no separate overview document, but an introduction in part 1 that explains what the content of the three parts is.
>
>> Since Part I was a CD04 you couldn't rename it back to CD01; CD05 makes sense as long as one of the parts hasn't reached that level yet.
>
> Okay. CD05 actually is my preference, since renaming the parts back to cd01 can only lead to confusion.
>
> Thank you for answering our questions.
>
> Best regards
>
> Michael
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> Regards,
>> Mary
>> On May 11, 2010, at 6:20 AM, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg wrote:
>>> Mary,
>>>
>>> so far the OpenDocument TC approved the three parts of the ODF 1.2
>>> specification individually as committee drafts, and has send them out
>>> for public review individually. That is, we have an
>>>
>>> OpenDocument-v1.2-part1-cd4, an OpenDocument-v1.2-part2-cd2 and an
>>> OpenDocument-v1.2-part3-cd1.
>>>
>>> Because the three parts of the ODF 1.2 specification shall become one
>>> single OASIS standard, we now want to approve the three parts as a single committee draft, and we also want to send them out for a single public review that covers all three parts.
>>>
>>> What is the correct name that the new CD would get when approved, and
>>> what would be the names of the three parts?
>>>
>>> Is the correct name for whole specification
>>>
>>> OpenDocument-v1.2-cd01
>>>
>>> and for the three parts:
>>>
>>> OpenDocument-v1.2-cd01-part1
>>> OpenDocument-v1.2-cd01-part2
>>> OpenDocument-v1.2-cd01-part3
>>>
>>> Could we also start with a cd05? That is:
>>>
>>> OpenDocument-v1.2-cd05
>>>
>>> for the whole specification, and for the three parts:
>>>
>>> OpenDocument-v1.2-cd05-part1
>>> OpenDocument-v1.2-cd05-part2
>>> OpenDocument-v1.2-cd05-part3
>>>
>>> This may avoid confusion caused by the fact that we had already cd1
>>> specifications for the three individual parts.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering
>>> StarOffice/OpenOffice.org
>>> Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55
>>> D-20097 Hamburg, Germany michael.brauer@sun.com
>>> http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500
>>> http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
>>>
>>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1,
>>> D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
>>> Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028
>>> Geschaeftsfuehrer: Jürgen Kunz
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>>> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
>>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>>>
>
>
> --
> Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering
> StarOffice/OpenOffice.org
> Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55
> D-20097 Hamburg, Germany michael.brauer@sun.com
> http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500
> http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
>
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1,
> D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
> Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028
> Geschaeftsfuehrer: Jürgen Kunz