OASIS Business Document Exchange (BDXR) TC

Expand all | Collapse all

Re: [bdxr-comment] SV: [members] 30 day Public Review for Business Document Envelope V1.1 - ends May 20th

  • 1.  Re: [bdxr-comment] SV: [members] 30 day Public Review for Business Document Envelope V1.1 - ends May 20th

    Posted 04-21-2016 19:50





    Dear Torsten


    Thank you very much for your valuable input. The cardinality of the ToParty was indeed an issue that was discussed by the TC during the work on BDE 1.1. I will put your input in the list of comments received so that the TC may open this issue for further
    discussion after the public review, after which we will publish a resolution log with all comments and conclusions. I will let you know when the comment resolution log has been published, as well as of any questions to your requirement that may arise during
    the work.


    Best regards,


    Kenneth











    From: < bdxr-comment@lists.oasis-open.org > on behalf of "Kirschner, Torsten" < Torsten.Kirschner@nav.no >
    Date: Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 10:30 AM
    To: " 'bdxr-comment@lists.oasis-open.org '" < bdxr-comment@lists.oasis-open.org >
    Subject: [bdxr-comment] SV: [members] 30 day Public Review for Business Document Envelope V1.1 - ends May 20th









    Dear BDXR TC,
     
    I have the following comment on the BDE v1.1:
    In the European EESSI project – Electronic Exchange of Social Security Information, run by DG EMPL, we have a need to address multiple recipients
    of a document on business level.
    If you could change the cardinality of the ToParty in the BDE from exactly one (1..1) to one or more (1..n), we could use the BDE in EESSI instead
    of a profile of the UN/CEFACT Standard Business Document Header (v1.3).
     
    Best regards
    Torsten
    --
    Med vennlig hilsen
    Torsten Kirschner

    områdearkitekt  

    Elektronisk Samhandling //  Forvaltningsseksjonen
    Prosjekt- og forvaltningsavdelingen // NAV IT
    ( : 928 27 731 //  +
    torsten.kirschner@nav.no
     





     














  • 2.  Re: [bdxr-comment] SV: [members] 30 day Public Review for Business Document Envelope V1.1 - ends May 20th

    Posted 05-25-2016 20:41




    Dear Torsten
     
    As promised the TC today began working on the comments received during the public review of BDE 1.1. Specifically regarding your comment about changing cardinality of the ToParty element
    to one or more (1..n), the question was raised whether such change would invalidate the confidentiality feature of BDE, obtained using payload encryption where the key of the recipient is used for the encryption ensuring that only the intended recipient is
    capable of understanding the content. If a BDE envelope was to have more than one recipient (ToParty), such one-to-one confidentiality would not be obtainable.
     
    Erlend Klakegg Bergheim of the BDXR TC will contact you directly to better understand your requirement and how we may work out a solution.
     
    Best regards,
     
    Kenneth Bengtsson
     
     
     

    From:
    <bdxr-comment@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Kenneth Bengtsson <kbengtsson@efact.pe>
    Date: Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 2:49 PM
    To: "Kirschner, Torsten" <Torsten.Kirschner@nav.no>, "'bdxr-comment@lists.oasis-open.org'" <bdxr-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>
    Cc: "bdxr@lists.oasis-open.org" <bdxr@lists.oasis-open.org>
    Subject: Re: [bdxr-comment] SV: [members] 30 day Public Review for Business Document Envelope V1.1 - ends May 20th


     






    Dear Torsten


     


    Thank you very much for your valuable input. The cardinality of the ToParty was indeed an issue that was discussed by the TC during the work on BDE 1.1. I will put your input
    in the list of comments received so that the TC may open this issue for further discussion after the public review, after which we will publish a resolution log with all comments and conclusions. I will let you know when the comment resolution log has been
    published, as well as of any questions to your requirement that may arise during the work.


     


    Best regards,


     


    Kenneth


     




     


    From:
    < bdxr-comment@lists.oasis-open.org > on behalf of "Kirschner, Torsten" < Torsten.Kirschner@nav.no >
    Date: Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 10:30 AM
    To: " 'bdxr-comment@lists.oasis-open.org '" < bdxr-comment@lists.oasis-open.org >
    Subject: [bdxr-comment] SV: [members] 30 day Public Review for Business Document Envelope V1.1 - ends May 20th


     



    Dear BDXR TC,
     
    I have the following comment on the BDE v1.1:
    In the European EESSI project – Electronic Exchange of Social Security Information, run by DG EMPL, we have a need to address multiple recipients of a document
    on business level.
    If you could change the cardinality of the ToParty in the BDE from exactly one (1..1) to one or more (1..n), we could use the BDE in EESSI instead of a profile
    of the UN/CEFACT Standard Business Document Header (v1.3).
     
    Best regards
    Torsten
    --
    Med vennlig hilsen
    Torsten Kirschner

    områdearkitekt  

    Elektronisk Samhandling //  Forvaltningsseksjonen
    Prosjekt- og forvaltningsavdelingen // NAV IT
    ( : 928 27 731 //  +
    torsten.kirschner@nav.no