Suresh,
The CPA Negotiation subteam is aware of the need to be able to bootstrap
the negotiation process. Since we have not done any detailed work on it
yet, it is probably not appropriate for the MSG team to put anything in the
V 1.1 spec.
Regards,
Marty
*************************************************************************************
Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
*************************************************************************************
"Damodaran, Suresh" <Suresh_Damodaran@stercomm.com> on 11/26/2001 10:59:44
AM
To: "'Arvola Chan'" <arvola@tibco.com>, "'Tony Fletcher'"
<tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com>, ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org,
ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org
cc:
Subject: RE: [ebxml-cppa] RE: [ebxml-msg] CPA & MS overriding parameters
Arvola,
I read the proposal with much interest. Looks good to me
based on my current understanding. I have a few minor
items you may consider.
1. There was a "signed" attribute in your first proposal which seems
to have disappeared in the second one. Was that a typo?
2. Please consider "perCPA" instead of "fixed" since we already have
"perMessage" (unless "fixed" has other semantics)
Another problem which may touch upon negotiation is,
can we have a message that does not require a CPA?
(don't you need one to bootstrap CPA creation negotiations?)
Should we have some statement that covers this issue?
Regards,
-Suresh