MHonArc v2.5.2 -->

















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]








Subject: Re: [xacml] Specification number...




From: Polar Humenn <polar@syr.edu>
To: Carlisle Adams <carlisle.adams@entrust.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 18:07:26 -0500 (EST)







I would call the specification 1.0 when it finally gets accepted by OASIS
as a standard.  We are really wreslting with the version of the document,
not the standard.

I like Bill's idea, of XACML 1.0, Document Version 0.1, 0.2, etc, label
the document 1.0 when its finally accepted.

-Polar

On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Carlisle Adams wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> On today's call we decided to change the number of the new Committee Spec.
> to 1.1 (since the version we approved prior to the start of the comment
> period was 1.0).  However, in several places in the spec we refer to "XACML
> v1.0", and all of our names (URIs) have "1.0" in them.  Ultimately, if we
> get to OASIS Standard, I assume that standard will be numbered 1.0.  This
> all seems potentially confusing.
>
> Would it be any better to call this Committee Specification version 1.01, or
> 1.0a, or 1.0.1?  Any other suggestions or comments?
>
> Please respond as soon as possible; I'd like to get the final version out
> today.
>
> Carlisle.
>









References:

[xacml] Specification number...
From: Carlisle Adams <carlisle.adams@entrust.com>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]


  









Powered by eList eXpress LLC