I would trim trim trim. Even if it were to beat the new architecture spec out, it could reference the old. That then moves to the more significant question: what remains to be done to advance the next version of the Architecture spec? From:
openc2@lists.oasis-open.org <
openc2@lists.oasis-open.org> On Behalf Of Lemire, Dave (HII-TSD) Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2021 10:18 AM To: TC OpenC2 <
openc2@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: [openc2] HTTPS Spec Section 1 Work Product Editors & TC members, What’s our current thinking WRT the content of section 1 of Actuator Profiles and Transfer Specs? The original three specs had a mostly common section 1 for accessibility purposes. In contrast the new MQTT transfer spec’s section 1 is extremely concise. The current PF AP draft is more like the originals, but I’m guessing mostly because it descends from the SLPF AP. In prepping the HTTPS spec toward a v1.1, should I trim section 1 down so it looks more like the MQTT spec? I guess a related question is where do we stand on making the Architecture Spec a reality? Dave David Lemire IA Systems Engineer Technical Solutions 302 Sentinel Drive Annapolis Junction, MD 20701 Work (301) 575-5190 Mobile (240) 938-9350