MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
xacml message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Minutes of October 13 2005 XACML TC Meeting
Argyn Kuketayev
Tim Moses
David Staggs
Anthony Nadalin
Erik Rissanen
Hal Lockhart
Bill Parducci (minutes)
Anne Anderson
Ron Williams
*******Quorum reached (81% per Kavi)
Agenda:
I. Minutes from September 29 meeting voted upon:
Approved unanimously
No objections
II. F2F - Review
Hal reviewed the Bill and Michiharu's proposals for addressing
Bill's outstanding Use Cases. Tim said he is interested in following
the work Bill and Michiharu are doing, but is not actively pursuing
Generalized Decisions at this time.
All "Pending Review" Issues (except #1) were closed during the F2F.
Bill noted that in the meeting a number of Issues were identified as
being created by and depend upon Frank. The Chairs need to contact
Frank to determine if he will be able to continue working on these
topics.
David presented information on how the U.S. VA is architecting its
access control solution and what requirements they are addressing.
It was noted that although Erik's team has come up with a model for
Indirect Delegates, the subject is too complicated for the XACML
model as it pertains to current and near term adoption.
The F2F group felt that the v3 document should be composed of a core
document and separate Profile documents. "open" Target, etc. will be
dealt with in the Core document, while Delegation, etc. will be
covered in the ancillary documents.
Tim will tentatively continue to act as Editor for the Core
document.
Hal offered that Delegation will introduce architectural changes to
the XACML model.
III. Conformance Tests
Argyn reviewed the v2 conformance tests. The prior tests run against
the new schema are stable. Argyn will begin adding more tests to
exercise functionality associated with v2.
Argyn asked what is involved for non TC members to be able to
contribute Conformance Tests.
Argyn also noted that it is impractical to repost the entire
conformance test suite with each update. Bill suggested that this
task could be addressed with an SCM like subversion or CVS. Hal said
that Oasis is looking at solutions for the repository model.
meeting adjourned.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]