OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

Back to discussions
Expand all | Collapse all

Re: [office] Rules for handling parsing errors (was: proposalfor ODF1.2: extension of verticalrelationvaluesfor certainanchor types)

  • 1.  Re: [office] Rules for handling parsing errors (was: proposalfor ODF1.2: extension of verticalrelationvaluesfor certainanchor types)

    Posted 07-04-2008 10:03 
    Well just put them on the agenda. If we don't have time -- fine. As long as they are "in the loop" its OK for me.

And I guess an answer to that question is quite important for Olivers proposal.


~Florian


>>> Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg


  • 2.  Re: [office] Rules for handling parsing errors (was: proposal forODF1.2: extension of verticalrelationvaluesfor certain anchor types)

    Posted 07-04-2008 14:10 
    Dear TC members,

Florian Reuter wrote:
> Well just put them on the agenda. If we don't have time -- fine. As long as they are "in the loop" its OK for me.
> 
> And I guess an answer to that question is quite important for Olivers proposal.
> 

 From my point of view the discussion of Florian's general request to 
define the reaction on unknown property values has no impact on my 
proposal regarding the extension of vertical relation values for certain 
anchor types.

Regards, Oliver.

> 
> ~Florian
> 
> 
>>>> Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg


  • 3.  Re: [office] Rules for handling parsing errors (was: proposal forODF1.2: extension of verticalrelationvaluesfor certain anchor types)

    Posted 07-04-2008 14:45 
    Florian,

Florian Reuter wrote:
> Well just put them on the agenda. If we don't have time -- fine. As long as they are "in the loop" its OK for me.

I have added this to the agenda, but the best way to actually track this 
idea would be to create a proposal wiki page for this. We may then 
schedule the discussion of your idea in the same way as that of any 
other proposal.

The page does not have to be very detailed at the start. It should be 
sufficient if it states what you have said already. This would allow us 
to have a first discussion of the topic that allows you to figure out if 
you want to further elaborate the idea, or just cancel its discussion.

Michael

> 
> And I guess an answer to that question is quite important for Olivers proposal.
> 
> 
> ~Florian
> 
> 
>>>> Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg


Related Content