On 22 August, Ken Yagen writes: [xacml] XACML August 22, 2002 Minutes > [Anne, 21 Aug 2002] Conformance Tests: > Some was waiting on Daniel and Polar to complete functions. > Anne suggests remove description of test suite and just state it is V from "Conformance (normative)" section of spec > available. Test suite is an aid to developers who wish to attest to > conforming to XACML. It is not required and Simon feels language should be > made clearer to communicate that. Wording says that it is required for > attestation of successfully using but not for conformance. Test suite is not > as broad as conformance table. Attesting of successful use means you are > passing the test suite. Conformance is determined independently. Hal > suggests it should be the other way around. Anne said we want to avoid it > seeming like a branding program. Other committees have not been concerned > about interoperability or completeness in determining attesting of > successfully using. Are the three implementers going to implement the > complete mandatory sections? Anne -- Anne H. Anderson Email:
Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM Sun Microsystems Laboratories 1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311 Tel: 781/442-0928 Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA Fax: 781/442-1692