Hi Rob,
On 02.02.09 15:31, robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote:
> The ODF-Next SC has been iterating on text for the call for proposals for
> ODF-Next. We've also figured out how to automate the extraction of
> comments from the mailing list, so we're confident we can handle any
> volume we receive.
>
> Here is the latest version of the text we have. I'd like to see this
> approved by the TC and sent out ASAP. If we can get this done now, there
> is a good chance that we'll get the bulk of the ODF-Next traffic (likely
> front-loaded) before we send the send ODF 1.2 out for public review.
>
> If there is time on today's TC call, I'd like to briefly discuss and see
> if the TC agrees that we can go forward with this.
Looks good to me.
Bettina, who has had a closer look at it than me, has found two spelling
errors.
There are only two minor corrections or suggestions:
> Concurrent with these final stages of ODF 1.2 work -- which may take
> several months -- the ODF TC wishes to start a public conversation related
> to the technical contents of "ODF-Next", the provisional name for the next
> major version of ODF. The ODF TC has created a subcommittee, the ODF
> Requirements Subcommittee, chaired by Bob Jolliffe
>