Hi Jonathan; Your text of 26 January 2002 came to my browser-based email client looking like this: ************** If xml:lang for is to specify the language of non / content then I'd agree that we should make the xml:lang attribute mandatory for /. This should remove any temptation to interpret the xml:lang as the default for . ************** It seems that there are bits missing. Could you please re-send as plain text? Thanks in advance, David L ************************************************************
Jonathan_Clark@lionbridge.com wrote on 1/26/02 12:07:05 AM ************************************************************ If xml:lang for <xliff> is to specify the language of non <source>/<target> content then I'd agree that we should make the xml:lang attribute mandatory for <source>/<target>. This should remove any temptation to interpret the <xliff> xml:lang as the default for <source>.