MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
emergency message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [emergency] FW: Suggestion: Add incidentKeyword to contentObject
Yup.
Ciao,
Rex
At 9:45 AM +1000 1/31/06, Renato Iannella wrote:
>On 31 Jan 2006, at 04:05, Elysa Jones wrote:
>
>>I don't think anyone on the TC is interested in going back for a
>>60-day review at this point in the EDXL-DE. If anyone feels
>>strongly the other way with respect to this change, please let me
>>know.
>
>Not that I feel strongly about it, but we should be aware that the
>OASIS TC process defines "Substantive Change" as:
>
> "a change to a specification that would require a compliant application or
> implementation to be modified or rewritten in order to remain compliant."
>
>This is undoubtedly the case for the current version of EDXL-DE.
>
>
>Cheers... Renato Iannella
>National ICT Australia (NICTA)
>
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>This email and any attachments may be confidential. They may contain legally
>privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy,
>use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended
>recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both
>messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus,
>data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised
>amendment. This notice should not be removed.
--
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-849-2309
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]