OASIS Emergency Management TC

Re: [emergency] XML Content namespacing

  • 1.  Re: [emergency] XML Content namespacing

    Posted 12-08-2005 05:26
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    emergency message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Re: [emergency] XML Content namespacing


    On 8 Dec 2005, at 12:21, Ellis, David wrote:

    The use of partial encryption of elements might work on medium security industrial applications, but for pre event sensor and intelligence-related messaging activity for national security, bulk encryption of the entire embeddedXMLContent will undoubtedly be required.�

    My proposal allows this. The examples I gave included non-encrypted elements to show how we can
    support such payloads much�simpler and efficiently.

    I am not a convinced we need to make CAP �default namespace copying� as such an important requirement.� The release of CAP 1.1 and in the future resource management and sensor systems payloads will most like require applications to use XSLT processes to create new messages and adding prefix element names during transformation would be trivial� (CAP1.0:alert , CAP1.1:alert etc.


    This was just an example of default namespacing. You can use any relevant XML Namespace for the payload, with
    or without namespace prefixes. Since this is all XML, then this support is mandatory and fundamental for any
    system creating/parsing EDXL elements.


    Changes in this method now are significant and would break many prototype EDXL DE applications created during public comment of the EDXL Distribution Element.

    *Any* change we make will "break" early implementations of EDXL-DE. That is a fact of life in the process
    of standardisation. The Committee Draft makes that very clear [1]. If we make "Substantive Changes" then we
    can go out for more public comments.�


    Cheers...� Renato Iannella
    National ICT Australia (NICTA)

    [1] <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#3.2>

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    This email and any attachments may be confidential. They may contain legally
    privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy,
    use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended
    recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both
    messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus,
    data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised
    amendment. This notice should not be removed.
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]