MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
ubl message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Outcomes of joint SC call 2004.04.02
i will volunteer to be part of this. but i would add that there are
more deliverables than just schemas for UBL 1.1
first, a priority has to be the UBL position for the OAG meeting at the
end of April. we must have a clear statement of what we will be doing
for 1.1, if they agree to align. we cannot still be debating what to do
internally.
second, is the joint OAG/UBL submission to the mutually agreed upon
standards organization such as UN/CEFACT ATG2 or ISO.
jon.bosak@sun.com wrote:
>[tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au:]
>
>| >Most importantly, this plan has not yet been presented to
>| > the OAG membership, so we cannot be sure that changes we
>| > implement in UBL 1.0 will match changes implemented in OAGIS
>| > 9.0. We should know more about this following the OAG
>| > meeting scheduled for the end of this month.
>|
>| is there an action to ensure UBL's committed position on item (2) and
>| (3) will be finalised by then? I think the onus is on us to take the
>| initaitive or we will just cycle round again.
>
>I think that two things are needed here:
>
>1. The inclusion of CCTS schema alignment on our "to do" list for
> 1.1. I've already got this entered on a list that I will be
> putting out for review and approval once we've got the 1.0
> packaging done.
>
>2. The appointment of a team to actually engage with our
> counterparts in OAG so that we have something done in time for
> 1.1. This is harder. Are there volunteers?
>
>Jon
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>
>
--
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228
postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]