Rob,
Under that scenario, when does it become possible to prepare the amendment?
That is, what are the two inputs from which the amendment is derived?
Original Message-----
From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com]
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/201003/msg00421.html
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 10:06
To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org
Cc: Michael Brauer; ODF TC List; Patrick Durusau; Svante.Schubert@Sun.COM
Subject: [office] Re: OFFICE-2608 and Errata CD04 Defects
[ ... ]
1) ISO/IEC 26300 + COR1 + COR2 will satisfy all outstanding defect reports
against ODF 1.0. We process them as both Errata and Corrigenda.
2)We adopt the same changes, where applicable, to OASIS ODF 1.1. Some
changes will not be needed, since they are already fixed in ODF 1.1. But
the remaining fixes become Approved Errata for ODF 1.1
3) The delta between the corrected OASIS ODF 1.1 and the corrected ISO/IEC
26300 becomes the amendment.
Note that we might want to keep the errata for ODF 1.1 open until the ODF
1.0 amendment completes its ballot in SC34. Then if we do need to make
any additional non substantive fixes we can place such fixes in the errata
as well. So in practice steps 2 and 3 overlap.
Regards,
-Rob
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php