MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
xacml message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] Which date duration functions mandatory?
I have a little different idea about restriction on date duration function.
My understanding is that any function that requires duration data type
(yearMonthDuration, dayTimeDuration etc.) as an input and/or an output is
NOT mandatory. It is simpler for implementers.
Michiharu
IBM Tokyo Research Laboratory, Internet Technology
Tel. +81 (46) 215-4642 Fax +81 (46) 273-7428
Anne Anderson -
Sun Microsystems To: xacml@lists.oasis-open.org
<Anne.Anderson@Su cc:
n.COM> Subject: [xacml] Which date duration functions mandatory?
2002/07/25 00:22
Please respond to
Anne.Anderson
We decided not to make date duration functions mandatory for XACML 1.0,
because they can be a bear to get right.
For conformance tests, I am trying to pin down exactly which functions
are "date duration" functions. The following is my understanding:
Any function that requires converting a value into a new date value is
NOT mandatory. I.e. "7/24/02 plus 10 days = 8/3/02" is NOT mandatory.
Any function that requires subtracting two date values to obtain a
duration is NOT mandatory. I.e. "8/3/02 - 7/24/02 = 10 days" is NOT
mandatory.
Any function that adds, subtracts, etc. durations of days, months, or
years to yield a new duration IS mandatory. I.e. "8 days plus 10 days
= 18 days" IS mandatory.
Anne Anderson Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM
Internet Security Research Group, Sun Labs
Sun Microsystems, Inc., Burlington, MA
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC