Yves and Ryan, If I read the comment correctly, this seems to be fixed. All of the examples now have the namespace prefix. Can you verify? I could not find any email documenting the fix. Since it is an editorial fix, I guess it does not need a formal CFD. Thanks, Bryan Subject : csprd02 comment - Namespace in Validation Module From : "Yves Savourel" <
yves@opentag.com> To : <
xliff-comment@lists.oasis-open.org> Date : Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:53:41 -0600 Hi all, None of the 13 snippets of code used as example in the Appendix I (Validation Module) is valid. They are all missing namespace information. Regards, -yves