MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]








Subject: [xacml] Condition language




From: Michiharu Kudoh <KUDO@jp.ibm.com>
To: "'xacml@lists.oasis-open.org'" <xacml@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 22:56:22 +0900






I have a little different idea on the XACML condition language. The current
specification aims at defining XACML local syntax and the semantics. I
think it is one way to proceed. The other way would be to borrow the syntax
and the semantics from other promising standards as much as possible. For
example, the semantics of the string comparison is also defined in XPath
1.0 document. "/ContextPrincipals/ContextPrincipal/SimplePrincipal
= 'Alice' '' compares the text node of the SimplePrincipal element in the
XACML context and "Alice". It also supports AND, OR, NOT, element
reference, arithmetic computation, and the type conversion. If we specify
this "string expression" in the condition element as described below, the
semantics of this expression is explicitly defined in XPath standard. The
merit is that we don't have to worry about the syntax and the semantics of
the expression evaluation in XACML. The downside would be when XPath 2.0
becomes recommendation, we may have to update some part of our document.
But I still think this is another practical way to specify the condition
expression.

<Conditions>
  <Condition expression
="/ContextPrincipals/ContextPrincipal/SimplePrincipal = 'Alice'">/
</Conditions>

Best regards,
Michiharu Kudo

IBM Tokyo Research Laboratory, Internet Technology
Tel. +81 (46) 215-4642   Fax +81 (46) 273-7428









Follow-Ups:

Re: [xacml] Condition language
From: bill parducci <bill@parducci.net>
[xacml] minutes 27-05
From: ernesto damiani <edamiani@crema.unimi.it>








[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]


  









Powered by eList eXpress LLC