Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) Bindings and Mappings (AMQP-BINDMAP) TC

Hi guys, I have noted the following on the web wd 03 document: - Abstract, 2nd para, 2nd sentence - sub-protocols should be subprotocols Same in sect 3.1 4th para, sect 5.1 2nd para, sect 5.2 2nd para, sect 7 1st para - Sect 1, 2nd para, 2nd sentence - "in-turn" should be "in turn" - Sect 1, 3rd para, 1st bullet - "pass-through" should be "pass through" - Sect 1, 4th para, "Web Sockets" should be "WebSocket" - Sect 1.2, 1st item - it looks like there's an odd character inside the [AMQP] - Sect 2.1, 3rd and 4th para - one says protocol, the other says sub-protocol. Which is it? If the latter, should be subprotocol. (I know [XMPPWS] says sub-protocol -it's wrong ;-) - Sect 2.2, 2nd para "there MAY be potentiallyŠ" is redundant; remove "potentially" - Sect 2.3 - why are the 2 HTTP example sequences labeled as Figures, but the figure in sect 1 isn't and the protocol visualization in this section isn't? Same question for section 3.4, 4.1, 4.2, 6.1 (additionally, sect 6.1 labels them Figure X and Figure Y instead of real numbers) - Sect 3 - the sentence would be clearer written as a set of bullets, such as: To establish a connection: 1. open the WebSocket Protocol connection 2. perform a SASL authentication exchange, and 3. open the AMQP connection. The following sections explain these steps. - Sect 5.1 - para 1 and 3 are almost the same except for AMQP type code value. Which one is it? Para 2 and 4 seem pretty close too. Sect 5.2 has the same issue. - Sect 6, 2nd para, 3rd sentence - what is a "majority finished transmission"? - Sect 7 has a TODO label - what to do with this? - Sect 8 - can this be resolved between CSD and CS?

Thanks for your detailed review Steve. I'll be building a WD04 soon which incorporate these suggestions along with other review comments. There are also a couple of technical errors in WD03 that I’ll work with the other editors to resolve in WD04.   Regards, Dave.  
Original Message----- From: Steve Huston [mailto:shuston@riverace.com] Sent: 19 September 2013 03:54 To: David Ingham; Rob Dolin (MS OPEN TECH); Robert Godfrey Cc: amqp-bindmap@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Notes on Websockets WD 03   Hi guys,   I have noted the following on the web wd 03 document:   - Abstract, 2nd para, 2nd sentence - sub-protocols should be subprotocols Same in sect 3.1 4th para, sect 5.1 2nd para, sect 5.2 2nd para, sect 7 1st para   - Sect 1, 2nd para, 2nd sentence - "in-turn" should be "in turn"   - Sect 1, 3rd para, 1st bullet - "pass-through" should be "pass through"   - Sect 1, 4th para, "Web Sockets" should be "WebSocket"   - Sect 1.2, 1st item - it looks like there's an odd character inside the [AMQP]   - Sect 2.1, 3rd and 4th para - one says protocol, the other says sub-protocol. Which is it? If the latter, should be subprotocol. (I know [XMPPWS] says sub-protocol -it's wrong ;-)   - Sect 2.2, 2nd para "there MAY be potentiallyŠ" is redundant; remove "potentially"   - Sect 2.3 - why are the 2 HTTP example sequences labeled as Figures, but the figure in sect 1 isn't and the protocol visualization in this section isn't? Same question for section 3.4, 4.1, 4.2, 6.1 (additionally, sect 6.1 labels them Figure X and Figure Y instead of real numbers)   - Sect 3 - the sentence would be clearer written as a set of bullets, such as: To establish a connection: 1. open the WebSocket Protocol connection 2. perform a SASL authentication exchange, and 3. open the AMQP connection. The following sections explain these steps.   - Sect 5.1 - para 1 and 3 are almost the same except for AMQP type code value. Which one is it?  Para 2 and 4 seem pretty close too. Sect 5.2 has the same issue.   - Sect 6, 2nd para, 3rd sentence - what is a "majority finished transmission"?   - Sect 7 has a TODO label - what to do with this?   - Sect 8 - can this be resolved between CSD and CS?