OASIS Energy Interoperation TC

Expand all | Collapse all

CS Ballot Motion

  • 1.  CS Ballot Motion

    Posted 02-01-2012 18:36
    Though a TC request or motion is not necessary to complete the CS process on the errata, given the TC discussions,  I make the following motion under the TC standing rules: I move that the chairs be directed to submit the completed errata CSPRD04 as publicly reviewed to TC Admin to create a Special Majority Ballot for Committee Specification. Is there a second? Are there any objections? Thanks! bill cox -- William Cox Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com +1 862 485 3696 mobile +1 908 277 3460 fax


  • 2.  Re: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion

    Posted 02-01-2012 18:38
    I second. -Rish On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:36 AM, William Cox < wtcox@coxsoftwarearchitects.com > wrote: Though a TC request or motion is not necessary to complete the CS process on the errata, given the TC discussions,  I make the following motion under the TC standing rules: I move that the chairs be directed to submit the completed errata CSPRD04 as publicly reviewed to TC Admin to create a Special Majority Ballot for Committee Specification. Is there a second? Are there any objections? Thanks! bill cox -- William Cox Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com +1 862 485 3696 mobile +1 908 277 3460 fax -- Rish Ghatikar Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Road, MS: 90-3111, Berkeley, CA 94720 GGhatikar@lbl.gov +1 510.486.6768 +1 510.486.4089 [fax] This email is intended for the addressee only and may contain confidential information and should not be copied without permission. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender as soon as possible and delete the email from computer[s].


  • 3.  Re: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion

    Posted 02-01-2012 18:46
    Thanks, Rish and Bruce. Any objections? Thanks! bill -- William Cox Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com +1 862 485 3696 mobile +1 908 277 3460 fax On 2/1/12 1:37 PM, Girish Ghatikar wrote: I second. -Rish On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:36 AM, William Cox < wtcox@coxsoftwarearchitects.com > wrote: Though a TC request or motion is not necessary to complete the CS process on the errata, given the TC discussions,  I make the following motion under the TC standing rules: I move that the chairs be directed to submit the completed errata CSPRD04 as publicly reviewed to TC Admin to create a Special Majority Ballot for Committee Specification. Is there a second? Are there any objections? Thanks! bill cox -- William Cox Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com +1 862 485 3696 mobile +1 908 277 3460 fax -- Rish Ghatikar Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Road, MS: 90-3111, Berkeley, CA 94720 GGhatikar@lbl.gov +1 510.486.6768 +1 510.486.4089 [fax] This email is intended for the addressee only and may contain confidential information and should not be copied without permission. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender as soon as possible and delete the email from computer[s].


  • 4.  Re: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion

    Posted 02-01-2012 18:47
    No objections.  Thank you! Rish Ghatikar Lawrence Berkeley National Lab.  +1 510.486.6768 On Feb 1, 2012, at 1:45 PM, William Cox < wtcox@coxsoftwarearchitects.com > wrote: Thanks, Rish and Bruce. Any objections? Thanks! bill -- William Cox Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com +1 862 485 3696 mobile +1 908 277 3460 fax On 2/1/12 1:37 PM, Girish Ghatikar wrote: I second. -Rish On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:36 AM, William Cox < wtcox@coxsoftwarearchitects.com > wrote: Though a TC request or motion is not necessary to complete the CS process on the errata, given the TC discussions,  I make the following motion under the TC standing rules: I move that the chairs be directed to submit the completed errata CSPRD04 as publicly reviewed to TC Admin to create a Special Majority Ballot for Committee Specification. Is there a second? Are there any objections? Thanks! bill cox -- William Cox Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com +1 862 485 3696 mobile +1 908 277 3460 fax -- Rish Ghatikar Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Road, MS: 90-3111, Berkeley, CA 94720 GGhatikar@lbl.gov +1 510.486.6768 +1 510.486.4089 [fax] This email is intended for the addressee only and may contain confidential information and should not be copied without permission. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender as soon as possible and delete the email from computer[s].


  • 5.  RE: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion

    Posted 02-01-2012 20:01
    No objections   From: energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Girish Ghatikar Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 1:47 PM To: William Cox Cc: Bruce Bartell; EITC Subject: Re: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion   No objections.  Thank you!   Rish Ghatikar Lawrence Berkeley National Lab.  +1 510.486.6768 On Feb 1, 2012, at 1:45 PM, William Cox < wtcox@coxsoftwarearchitects.com > wrote: Thanks, Rish and Bruce. Any objections? Thanks! bill -- William Cox Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com +1 862 485 3696 mobile +1 908 277 3460 fax On 2/1/12 1:37 PM, Girish Ghatikar wrote: I second. -Rish On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:36 AM, William Cox < wtcox@coxsoftwarearchitects.com > wrote: Though a TC request or motion is not necessary to complete the CS process on the errata, given the TC discussions,  I make the following motion under the TC standing rules: I move that the chairs be directed to submit the completed errata CSPRD04 as publicly reviewed to TC Admin to create a Special Majority Ballot for Committee Specification. Is there a second? Are there any objections? Thanks! bill cox -- William Cox Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com +1 862 485 3696 mobile +1 908 277 3460 fax -- Rish Ghatikar Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Road, MS: 90-3111, Berkeley, CA 94720 GGhatikar@lbl.gov +1 510.486.6768 +1 510.486.4089 [fax] This email is intended for the addressee only and may contain confidential information and should not be copied without permission. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender as soon as possible and delete the email from computer[s].


  • 6.  RE: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion

    Posted 02-01-2012 20:20
    No objections. B.O.  February 1, 2012   Robert Old Siemens Industry, Inc. Infrastructure & Cities Sector Building Technologies Division 1000 Deerfield Pkwy. Buffalo Grove, IL 60089-4513 Tel.: +1 (847) 941-5623 mailto:bob.old@siemens.com www.usa.siemens.com/buildingtechnologies   From: energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of William Cox Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 12:46 PM To: Girish Ghatikar; Bruce Bartell Cc: EITC Subject: Re: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion   Thanks, Rish and Bruce. Any objections? Thanks! bill -- William Cox Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com +1 862 485 3696 mobile +1 908 277 3460 fax On 2/1/12 1:37 PM, Girish Ghatikar wrote: I second. -Rish On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:36 AM, William Cox < wtcox@coxsoftwarearchitects.com > wrote: Though a TC request or motion is not necessary to complete the CS process on the errata, given the TC discussions,  I make the following motion under the TC standing rules: I move that the chairs be directed to submit the completed errata CSPRD04 as publicly reviewed to TC Admin to create a Special Majority Ballot for Committee Specification. Is there a second? Are there any objections? Thanks! bill cox -- William Cox Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com +1 862 485 3696 mobile +1 908 277 3460 fax -- Rish Ghatikar Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Road, MS: 90-3111, Berkeley, CA 94720 GGhatikar@lbl.gov +1 510.486.6768 +1 510.486.4089 [fax] This email is intended for the addressee only and may contain confidential information and should not be copied without permission. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender as soon as possible and delete the email from computer[s].


  • 7.  RE: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion

    Posted 02-01-2012 18:38
    Second.   Bruce Bartell Xtensible Solutions Mobile : +1.321.258.6500 bbartell@xtensible.net      www.xtensible.net   From: energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto: energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org ] On Behalf Of William Cox Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 1:36 PM To: EITC Subject: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion   Though a TC request or motion is not necessary to complete the CS process on the errata, given the TC discussions,  I make the following motion under the TC standing rules: I move that the chairs be directed to submit the completed errata CSPRD04 as publicly reviewed to TC Admin to create a Special Majority Ballot for Committee Specification. Is there a second? Are there any objections? Thanks! bill cox -- William Cox Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com +1 862 485 3696 mobile +1 908 277 3460 fax


  • 8.  Re: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion

    Posted 02-01-2012 18:47
    Under Roberts Rules, the chair cannot make, nor second, a motion.  Just in case this is an issue, as de facto move maker, please feel free to substitute my name should it be required. Phil Phil Davis Senior Manager Schneider Electric Demand Response Resource Center 3103 Medlock Bridge Road, Suite 100 Norcross, GA  30071 404.567.6090   phil.davis@schneider-electric.com     www.schneider-electric.com   On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:36 PM, William Cox < wtcox@coxsoftwarearchitects.com > wrote: Though a TC request or motion is not necessary to complete the CS process on the errata, given the TC discussions,  I make the following motion under the TC standing rules: I move that the chairs be directed to submit the completed errata CSPRD04 as publicly reviewed to TC Admin to create a Special Majority Ballot for Committee Specification. Is there a second? Are there any objections? Thanks! bill cox -- William Cox Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com +1 862 485 3696 mobile +1 908 277 3460 fax ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for SPAM content and Viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security System. ________________________________________________________________________


  • 9.  RE: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion

    Posted 02-01-2012 20:09
    No objections.     From: energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of William Cox Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:36 AM To: EITC Subject: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion   Though a TC request or motion is not necessary to complete the CS process on the errata, given the TC discussions,  I make the following motion under the TC standing rules: I move that the chairs be directed to submit the completed errata CSPRD04 as publicly reviewed to TC Admin to create a Special Majority Ballot for Committee Specification. Is there a second? Are there any objections? Thanks! bill cox -- William Cox Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com +1 862 485 3696 mobile +1 908 277 3460 fax


  • 10.  RE: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion

    Posted 02-01-2012 20:43
    No objections.   From: energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of William Cox Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:36 AM To: EITC Subject: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion   Though a TC request or motion is not necessary to complete the CS process on the errata, given the TC discussions,  I make the following motion under the TC standing rules: I move that the chairs be directed to submit the completed errata CSPRD04 as publicly reviewed to TC Admin to create a Special Majority Ballot for Committee Specification. Is there a second? Are there any objections? Thanks! bill cox -- William Cox Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com +1 862 485 3696 mobile +1 908 277 3460 fax


  • 11.  RE: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion

    Posted 02-01-2012 21:22
    No objections   Thanks,   Chuck Thomas Office: (865)218-8031 Cell: (865)384-8578 cthomas@epri.com   From: energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of William Cox Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 1:36 PM To: EITC Subject: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion   Though a TC request or motion is not necessary to complete the CS process on the errata, given the TC discussions,  I make the following motion under the TC standing rules: I move that the chairs be directed to submit the completed errata CSPRD04 as publicly reviewed to TC Admin to create a Special Majority Ballot for Committee Specification. Is there a second? Are there any objections? Thanks! bill cox -- William Cox Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com +1 862 485 3696 mobile +1 908 277 3460 fax


  • 12.  RE: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion

    Posted 02-02-2012 17:01
    No objections and a yes vote.   " It is the theory that decides what can be observed ."   - Albert Einstein Toby Considine Chair, OASIS oBIX Technical Committee U.S. National Inst. of Standards and Tech. Smart Grid Architecture Committee Facilities Technology Office University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC    Email: Toby.Considine@ unc.edu Phone: (919)962-9073 http://www.oasis-open.org blog: www.NewDaedalus.com     From: energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Thomas, Chuck Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 1:22 PM To: William Cox; EITC Subject: RE: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion   No objections   Thanks,   Chuck Thomas Office: (865)218-8031 Cell: (865)384-8578 cthomas@epri.com   From: energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of William Cox Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 1:36 PM To: EITC Subject: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion   Though a TC request or motion is not necessary to complete the CS process on the errata, given the TC discussions,  I make the following motion under the TC standing rules: I move that the chairs be directed to submit the completed errata CSPRD04 as publicly reviewed to TC Admin to create a Special Majority Ballot for Committee Specification. Is there a second? Are there any objections? Thanks! bill cox -- William Cox Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com +1 862 485 3696 mobile +1 908 277 3460 fax


  • 13.  RE: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion

    Posted 02-02-2012 17:04
    In case we started the voting:   I vote ‘yes’. Rolf    From: energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Considine, Toby (Campus Services IT) Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 9:01 AM To: 'EITC' Subject: RE: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion   No objections and a yes vote.   " It is the theory that decides what can be observed ."   - Albert Einstein Toby Considine Chair, OASIS oBIX Technical Committee U.S. National Inst. of Standards and Tech. Smart Grid Architecture Committee Facilities Technology Office University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC    Email: Toby.Considine@ unc.edu Phone: (919)962-9073 http://www.oasis-open.org blog: www.NewDaedalus.com     From: energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Thomas, Chuck Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 1:22 PM To: William Cox; EITC Subject: RE: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion   No objections   Thanks,   Chuck Thomas Office: (865)218-8031 Cell: (865)384-8578 cthomas@epri.com   From: energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of William Cox Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 1:36 PM To: EITC Subject: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion   Though a TC request or motion is not necessary to complete the CS process on the errata, given the TC discussions,  I make the following motion under the TC standing rules: I move that the chairs be directed to submit the completed errata CSPRD04 as publicly reviewed to TC Admin to create a Special Majority Ballot for Committee Specification. Is there a second? Are there any objections? Thanks! bill cox -- William Cox Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com +1 862 485 3696 mobile +1 908 277 3460 fax