OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC

Hello, Ryan and I propose Change Track is allowed on <xliff>, <group>, and <unit>. This proposal is independent of the issues around modules vs. core in schema, and order of elements (core vs. modules). If I do not hear dissent by the end of the week I will assume this proposal approved. Thanks, Bryan

Hi Bryan, Ryan, all, I'm guessing you meant "in **<file>**, <group> and <unit>" not "in **<xliff>**, <group> and <unit>". <xliff> has no extension point for elements (and we wouldn't want anything in <xliff> but <file> anyway). Right? Cheers, -yves
Original Message----- From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ] On Behalf Of Schnabel, Bryan S Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 1:39 PM To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [xliff] [csprd02 139] CFD: Propose Change Track is allowed on <xliff>, <group>, and <unit>. Hello, Ryan and I propose Change Track is allowed on <xliff>, <group>, and <unit>. This proposal is independent of the issues around modules vs. core in schema, and order of elements (core vs. modules). If I do not hear dissent by the end of the week I will assume this proposal approved. Thanks, Bryan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

I agree with Yves and also agree that this module should be explicitly allowed on the resulting set of elements Rgds dF Dr. David Filip ======================= LRC CNGL LT-Web CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone: +353-6120-2781 cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 facsimile: +353-6120-2734 http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452 mailto: david.filip@ul.ie On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Yves Savourel < ysavourel@enlaso.com > wrote: Hi Bryan, Ryan, all, I'm guessing you meant "in **<file>**, <group> and <unit>" not "in **<xliff>**, <group> and <unit>". <xliff> has no extension point for elements (and we wouldn't want anything in <xliff> but <file> anyway). Right? Cheers, -yves
Original Message----- From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ] On Behalf Of Schnabel, Bryan S Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 1:39 PM To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [xliff] [csprd02 139] CFD: Propose Change Track is allowed on <xliff>, <group>, and <unit>. Hello, Ryan and I propose Change Track is allowed on <xliff>, <group>, and <unit>. This proposal is independent of the issues around modules vs. core in schema, and order of elements (core vs. modules). If I do not hear dissent by the end of the week I will assume this proposal approved. Thanks, Bryan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

Yes, again I misfired. I agree the right elements to allow ctr are "**<file>**, <group> and <unit>" not "in **<xliff>**, <group> and <unit>."   That was a typo on my part.   But David I don’t understand “this module should be explicitly allowed on the resulting set of elements.”   Can you elaborate, or let me know if this changes my proposal?   From: Dr. David Filip [mailto:David.Filip@ul.ie] Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 2:20 PM To: Yves Savourel Cc: Schnabel, Bryan S; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [xliff] [csprd02 139] CFD: Propose Change Track is allowed on <xliff>, <group>, and <unit>.   I agree with Yves and also agree that this module should be explicitly allowed on the resulting set of elements Rgds dF Dr. David Filip ======================= LRC CNGL LT-Web CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone: +353-6120-2781 cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 facsimile: +353-6120-2734 http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452 mailto: david.filip@ul.ie   On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Yves Savourel < ysavourel@enlaso.com > wrote: Hi Bryan, Ryan, all, I'm guessing you meant "in **<file>**, <group> and <unit>" not "in **<xliff>**, <group> and <unit>". <xliff> has no extension point for elements (and we wouldn't want anything in <xliff> but <file> anyway). Right? Cheers, -yves
Original Message----- From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ] On Behalf Of Schnabel, Bryan S Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 1:39 PM To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [xliff] [csprd02 139] CFD: Propose Change Track is allowed on <xliff>, <group>, and <unit>. Hello, Ryan and I propose Change Track is allowed on <xliff>, <group>, and <unit>. This proposal is independent of the issues around modules vs. core in schema, and order of elements (core vs. modules). If I do not hear dissent by the end of the week I will assume this proposal approved. Thanks, Bryan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php  

By resulting I mean the same what you mean, i.e. correcting the mistake and replacing <xliff> with <file> in the set of elements, where the module is to be allowed.. Dr. David Filip ======================= LRC CNGL LT-Web CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone: +353-6120-2781 cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 facsimile: +353-6120-2734 http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452 mailto: david.filip@ul.ie On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Schnabel, Bryan S < bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com > wrote: Yes, again I misfired. I agree the right elements to allow ctr are "**<file>**, <group> and <unit>" not "in **<xliff>**, <group> and <unit>."   That was a typo on my part.   But David I don’t understand “this module should be explicitly allowed on the resulting set of elements.”   Can you elaborate, or let me know if this changes my proposal?   From: Dr. David Filip [mailto: David.Filip@ul.ie ] Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 2:20 PM To: Yves Savourel Cc: Schnabel, Bryan S; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [xliff] [csprd02 139] CFD: Propose Change Track is allowed on <xliff>, <group>, and <unit>.   I agree with Yves and also agree that this module should be explicitly allowed on the resulting set of elements Rgds dF Dr. David Filip ======================= LRC CNGL LT-Web CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone:  +353-6120-2781 cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 facsimile:  +353-6120-2734 http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452 mailto: david.filip@ul.ie   On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Yves Savourel < ysavourel@enlaso.com > wrote: Hi Bryan, Ryan, all, I'm guessing you meant "in **<file>**, <group> and <unit>" not "in **<xliff>**, <group> and <unit>". <xliff> has no extension point for elements (and we wouldn't want anything in <xliff> but <file> anyway). Right? Cheers, -yves
Original Message----- From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ] On Behalf Of Schnabel, Bryan S Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 1:39 PM To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [xliff] [csprd02 139] CFD: Propose Change Track is allowed on <xliff>, <group>, and <unit>. Hello, Ryan and I propose Change Track is allowed on <xliff>, <group>, and <unit>. This proposal is independent of the issues around modules vs. core in schema, and order of elements (core vs. modules). If I do not hear dissent by the end of the week I will assume this proposal approved. Thanks, Bryan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php  

Oh, right. Makes sense. So I guess we’ve cleared CFD. Ryan has given me the go-ahead to make the updates.   From: Dr. David Filip [mailto:David.Filip@ul.ie] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 10:25 AM To: Schnabel, Bryan S Cc: Dr. David Filip; Yves Savourel; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [xliff] [csprd02 139] CFD: Propose Change Track is allowed on <xliff>, <group>, and <unit>.   By resulting I mean the same what you mean, i.e. correcting the mistake and replacing <xliff> with <file> in the set of elements, where the module is to be allowed.. Dr. David Filip ======================= LRC CNGL LT-Web CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone: +353-6120-2781 cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 facsimile: +353-6120-2734 http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452 mailto: david.filip@ul.ie   On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Schnabel, Bryan S < bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com > wrote: Yes, again I misfired. I agree the right elements to allow ctr are "**<file>**, <group> and <unit>" not "in **<xliff>**, <group> and <unit>."   That was a typo on my part.   But David I don’t understand “this module should be explicitly allowed on the resulting set of elements.”   Can you elaborate, or let me know if this changes my proposal?   From: Dr. David Filip [mailto: David.Filip@ul.ie ] Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 2:20 PM To: Yves Savourel Cc: Schnabel, Bryan S; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [xliff] [csprd02 139] CFD: Propose Change Track is allowed on <xliff>, <group>, and <unit>.   I agree with Yves and also agree that this module should be explicitly allowed on the resulting set of elements Rgds dF Dr. David Filip ======================= LRC CNGL LT-Web CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone:  +353-6120-2781 cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 facsimile:  +353-6120-2734 http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452 mailto: david.filip@ul.ie   On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Yves Savourel < ysavourel@enlaso.com > wrote: Hi Bryan, Ryan, all, I'm guessing you meant "in **<file>**, <group> and <unit>" not "in **<xliff>**, <group> and <unit>". <xliff> has no extension point for elements (and we wouldn't want anything in <xliff> but <file> anyway). Right? Cheers, -yves
Original Message----- From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ] On Behalf Of Schnabel, Bryan S Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 1:39 PM To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [xliff] [csprd02 139] CFD: Propose Change Track is allowed on <xliff>, <group>, and <unit>. Hello, Ryan and I propose Change Track is allowed on <xliff>, <group>, and <unit>. This proposal is independent of the issues around modules vs. core in schema, and order of elements (core vs. modules). If I do not hear dissent by the end of the week I will assume this proposal approved. Thanks, Bryan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php