Yves, I am fine either way. Are you going to implement that and make a call for dissent? What about reserving the xlf prefix? eventually adding a set of xlf values? I think it is borderline either way, dropping an undefined feature seems pretty minor to me. However, I can understand that you want to freeze the core schema for 2.x versions, which is a commendable goal Thanks and cheers dF Dr. David Filip ======================= LRC CNGL LT-Web CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone: +353-6120-2781 cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 facsimile: +353-6120-2734
http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452 mailto:
david.filip@ul.ie On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Yves Savourel <
ysavourel@enlaso.com > wrote: Hi David, all, > I think the attribute should be dropped from <unit> and <group> I disagree: This type attribute is the equivalent of the restype in 1.2 and is used quite a lot to qualify a group or a unit. For example it's used in TM leveraging. For instance: in Windows resources a menu item "Help" may be translated "?" in French, but if it's a button it's translated "Aide". The unit's type allows to set the extra info that makes an exact match possible. It also help for general translation context. > The other possible fix would be to have them as strings with > undefined defaults, but the usability and interoperability of > such would be pretty limited. It's not really possible to define all the possible types, we saw that in 1.x. But we can use the same prefix mechanism use elsewhere. > ...this should slip to 2.x possibly 2.1 Pushing this to 2.x would mean the namespace URI for the Core 2.x would change and we **really** want to avoid that. We must get the Core done and as stable as possible for 2.0. So I would propose to complete the definition rather than drop it. In section "4.3.1.40 type" add: [[ When used in <group> or <unit>: The value MUST be composed of a prefix and a sub-value separated by a character : (U+003A). The prefix is a string uniquely identifying a collection of values for a specific authority. The sub-value is any string value defined by the authority. Default value: Undefined ]] And add the corresponding declaration in the schema. In my opinion that fix is an editorial change (adding a missing definition) while removing the attribute may qualify as a substantive change (removing a feature). Cheers, -yves --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php