UBL Naming and Design Rules SC

Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Re: Minutes for 6 February 2002 UBL NDR meeting

  • 1.  Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Re: Minutes for 6 February 2002 UBL NDR meeting

    Posted 02-09-2002 18:04
    At 05:28 PM 2/8/02 -0800, Eduardo Gutentag wrote:
    >"Eve L. Maler" wrote:
    > > Eduardo, please note the ACTION below that the SC hoped you would take
    > > on.  Can you positively acknowledge this?
    >
    >I believe there might be an error in the minutes; I have no recollection
    >of volunteering for this. This may be a voice-identification issue.
    
    I believe people discussed this after you dropped off, and they hoped you 
    would be willing to take on this action item after being informed that the 
    task needs doing.
    
    >Talking about confusion, I have a problem with the use of the term "leaf".
    >For me that refers to a non-branching element, that is an element with
    >attributes and data, but with no further elements contained in it. Many
    >people seem to use "leaf" with a rather different meaning. Could someone
    >explain to me what do they mean by "leaf"?
    
    Unfortunately, I wasn't in the conversation either.  I hope someone will 
    speak up to clarify.
    
    For my part, I think there's a clue in the CC structure that Mike R. 
    referred to in his recent message: the difference between the primary 
    content of a CC and its supplementary components.  For an element that 
    directly contains characters, it would be a fairly clean and 
    "deterministic" break to say that its content should be the primary content 
    associated with that CC and the supplementary components should be attributes.
    
    However, I fear that this may offer only a false hope if, for example, some 
    of the supplementary components have (or would benefit from) internal 
    structure.
    
    Also, if this is such a good dividing line, it would work for non-leaf 
    elements as well as leaf elements.  E.g., the primary content would be in 
    the form of some structured subelements and the supplementary components 
    could easily be attributes.
    
    I think it's time for a set of examples that's varied enough for us to test 
    the different scenarios.  Perhaps we can extract such a thing from the 
    growing PartyExample.  Arofan, can you speak to this?
    
             Eve
    --
    Eve Maler                                    +1 781 442 3190
    Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center   eve.maler @ sun.com