I have a family emergency. Kris Sent from my iPad On Nov 20, 2017, at 5:29 PM, Margaret Boos <
Margaret.Boos@PACCAR.com > wrote: I uploaded files with changes I made to match Excel files. My files have MB in file name and I kept the original so you can review the differences. The zip file is called faultDiagnostics-kje-revision-2(mb changes).zip. Some changes were to change xref to confref and use the <calibrationLabelValue> and <calibrationLabelUnit> elements. Some had items in MalfunctionGroup that belonged in the MalfunctionGroup previous. I also aligned symbols with values. Some symbols (e.g. =, >=, etc.) had <p> around them so they did not align with the associated value as they do in the Excel file. I did not comment the files. We can review together if you want. I think if you look in author view between the two files, you will see the differences. From: Kristen James Eberlein [ mailto:
kris@eberleinconsulting.com ] Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 11:55 AM To: Margaret Boos Subject: Revised faultDiagnostic topics Uploaded to Box in the DITA Samples folder: faultDiagnostics-kje-revision-2.zip I reworked the following topics in the faultDiagnostics.ditamap: faultDiagnostics_CCVCD_PRESS_PLAUS_KO_TEST.dita faultDiagnostics_CRANK.dita faultDiagnostics_Pedal_1_DC_RNG_HI_test.dita Here are the changes that I made: Made tables match the Excel files In the <malfunctionGroup> and <secondaryParameterGroup>, changed <xref> in the Threshold value and Enable condition cells to conrefs to <calibrationLabelValue> and <calibrationLabelUnit. In order to make the reworked topics valid, I also updated the DTD plug-in, which I'll mail out shortly. -- Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)