Dale,
There are a few intertwined issues being discussed:
1. Dispute Resolution
We need a process to resolve disputes, whether it's spec/schema
related or an interpretation issue or other.
2. Method for communicating/issuing corrections
(spec, schema and interpretations)
3. Distribution of the "normative" schema.
Regarding 1:
During spec development I believe it's the TC's responsibility to resolve
disputes using the standard consensus process. IMO, the TC should
investigate issues and provide a resolution.
AFTER a spec is released another process (hopefully one is defined by
OASIS), is used to resolve issues with the spec and other related documents.
Does OASIS already have such a process (Ian)? I suspect they do.
Regarding 2:
I'm assuming that OASIS standard processes dictate how specs and other
related documents are distributed, including errata. We should consult the
OASIS process for this.
Regarding 3:
I suspect people will cache schemas locally (I know I am) and individuals
should be responsible for updating these schemas, after receiving
notification of corrections via the process used in 2.
Dick Brooks
Systrends, Inc
7855 South River Parkway, Suite 111
Tempe, Arizona 85284
Web: www.systrends.com <http://www.systrends.com>
Phone:480.756.6777,Mobile:205-790-1542,eFax:240-352-0714