MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
xliff message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xliff] Re: XLIFF 1.2 Committee Draft Spec
Hi Everyone,
I also vote for option #3.
Best Regards,
AZ
Doug Domeny wrote:
> I favor option #2. It keeps the schedule and helps motivate us to
> review—I know I tend to wait until the last day. If for some reason many
> people can’t attend the conference call, then option #3 become the back
> up plan. That is, vote next Tuesday if quorum is met, otherwise, post it
> as an online ballot.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Doug Domeny
>
> Software Analyst
>
>
>
> Ektron, Inc.
>
> +1 603 594-0249 x212
>
> http://www.ektron.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* Tony Jewtushenko [mailto:tony.jewtushenko@productinnovator.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 09, 2006 11:00 AM
> *To:* xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
> *Cc:* ddomeny@ektron.com
> *Subject:* RE: [xliff] Re: XLIFF 1.2 Committee Draft Spec
>
>
>
> Thanks to allwho submitted their spec issues. While I can complete the
> revisions to the spec spotted and submitted bar one, I couldn't get it
> done by the deadline for the ballot, which has in fact passed (10am or
> even 11am EST).
>
>
>
> Although most of the revisions are small,there are a lot of them and
> then there's the one pointed out by Rudolfo regarding use of spaces in
> seg-source between mrk's which can't be fixed by a simple revision.
> We'll have to discuss it and make a decision. In any case I'll send out
> a revised 1.2 Committee Draft spec late today that will address the
> typos, missing bits and details that were submitted.
>
>
>
> We had twoscenarios outlined as of last week for how the ballot would
> proceed:
>
> 1/publish finalcommittee draft spec today - have 1 week ballot in time
> for next Tuesday's TC meeting.
>
> 2/if not published today, spec would be published before next Tuesday
> and would have a role call ballot to approve as Committee Draft.
>
>
>
> I would like to propose a 3rd option - to postpone the TC teleconference
> for one week until Tuesday 23 May, so we work towards publishing a final
> committee draft before next Tuesday 16 May, and set up a web ballot
> commencing 1 week before the TC teleconference.
>
>
>
> Option 1 is no longer viable, - so we're down to 2 options still - #2
> and #3.
>
>
>
> Any thoughts?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
>
>
>
>