I think that David and I have concluded that no change toTimeToLive is
needed since the needed comparison is between TimeToLive and the time that
the message recipient received the message.
Your philosophical point is, of course, correct.
Regards,
Marty
*************************************************************************************
Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
*************************************************************************************
Dan Weinreb <dlw@exceloncorp.com> on 11/06/2001 04:12:26 PM
Please respond to "Dan Weinreb" <dlw@exceloncorp.com>
To: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
cc: david@drummondgroup.com, arvola@tibco.com,
ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg]
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:49:30 -0500
From: "Martin W Sachs" <mwsachs@us.ibm.com>
Changing the name makes sense but won't there be a concern for existing
implementations? Of course, we are already doing much more violence to
DeliverySemantics, so why worry here?
If we keep the name the same and change its meaning, that's just as
bad for existing implementations.