OASIS Emergency Management TC

  • 1.  Figure 3 Revision

    Posted 01-20-2008 19:58



  • 2.  Tomorrow's a Holiday Re: [emergency-msg] Figure 3 Revision

    Posted 01-21-2008 00:09 
    Hi Again Everyone,

It finally dawned on me that tomorrow is a holiday. So, it seems that 
my suggestion of meeting to finish up work on EDXL-RM is not wise. 
So, I suggest we meet after the TC meeting Tuesday.

If that's agreeable, I will schedule it.

Cheers,
Rex

At 11:58 AM -0800 1/20/08, Rex Brooks wrote:
>Hi Folks,
>
>I have revised Figure 3. I would appreciate it if you would look it 
>over and make sure I haven't missed something.
>
>We are still short of the EDXL-DE revision of the current Section 6 
>plus inserting it into the spec early. Since Gary has done 
>presentations about EDXL-DE and implemented it, I would suggest he 
>take on the job unless it is posted by the owner of the action item 
>from the face-to-face, a detail that managed to escape my attention. 
>I think we're within sight of goal line to use a sports metaphor, 
>and I'm feeling very good about our work now. I think we have moved 
>the bar a little higher, and we are poised to push it higher still 
>in EDXL-RIM.
>
>So I'm proud to have worked with all of you on this specification, 
>as complex and painstaking as it is.
>
>Cheers,
>Rex
>--
>Rex Brooks
>President, CEO
>Starbourne Communications Design
>GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
>Berkeley, CA 94702
>Tel: 510-898-0670
>
>Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:ResourceMessageExchange2.JPG 
>(JPEG/ogle) (00365EE1)
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
>at:
>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php


-- 
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-898-0670


  • 3.  RE: [emergency-msg] Tomorrow's a Holiday Re: [emergency-msg] Figure 3 Revision

    Posted 01-21-2008 13:36 
    FYI, go with that if it works for everyone.  Lee and I will be traveling
back from DC meetings and likely won't be back in the office until 2:30.  I
then have a call at 3:00.

Just to confirm, the last version you sent out is the version we should be
pouring through for final group review right? (not withstanding issues that
have been identified in emails lately)...

Thanks,

Tim



    
                                                
    
					
                                                    

        
                                                
				
    
                                                
    
                                                    
                                                        
                                                        Original Message


  • 4.  RE: [emergency-msg] Tomorrow's a Holiday Re: [emergency-msg]Figure 3 Revision

    Posted 01-21-2008 14:26 
    Thanks Tim,

You're not quite correct. I was waiting to see if anyone found 
anything else to change in Figure 3 before I add it to Gary's Edit. 
Since no one has found or reported any corrections to the version I 
sent out, I am adding it to Gary's Edit and posting that now. It is 
Revision-010 (Redline) and Revision-010-cln (all corrections accepted 
or 'clean').

Given Patti's schedule and mine, I will ask our SC group to meet 
briefly using the TC line just to confirm that a meeting Wednesday at 
1:00 pm Pacific, 3:00 pm Central, and 4:00 pm Eastern Time is okay 
with everyone.

Cheers,
Rex

At 8:35 AM -0500 1/21/08, Timothy Grapes wrote:
>FYI, go with that if it works for everyone.  Lee and I will be traveling
>back from DC meetings and likely won't be back in the office until 2:30.  I
>then have a call at 3:00.
>
>Just to confirm, the last version you sent out is the version we should be
>pouring through for final group review right? (not withstanding issues that
>have been identified in emails lately)...
>
>Thanks,
>
>Tim
>
>
>
    
                                                
    
					
                                                    

        
                                                
				
    
                                                
    
                                                    
                                                        
                                                        Original Message


  • 5.  RE: [emergency-msg] Tomorrow's a Holiday Re: [emergency-msg] Figure 3 Revision

    Posted 01-21-2008 15:52 
    What is the purpose of the Wed. meeting?  Status and coordination?  Or is it
to have everyone's final read-through (against the version just sent out
today).  I think the team needs a little time to do a fine-tooth-comb final
read. 

Thanks,

Tim



    
                                                
    
					
                                                    

        
                                                
				
    
                                                
    
                                                    
                                                        
                                                        Original Message


  • 6.  RE: [emergency-msg] Tomorrow's a Holiday Re: [emergency-msg]Figure 3 Revision

    Posted 01-21-2008 16:40 
    Hi Tim,

I understand Tim. I think we should do a pulse check on this 
Wednesday afternoon. After we confirm that the Wednesday meeting time 
is okay immediately after the TC meeting tomorrow. I will send out a 
request that everyone give the document as much of a review as 
possible before Wednesday, and be ready to discuss any outstanding 
issues, such as the status of the revised EDXL-DE/Distribution of 
EDXL RM and set the deadline for final comments in our meeting 
Wednesday afternoon.

WRT to EDXL-DE/Distribution of EDXL RM, I asked Gary to consider 
taking on the task before we heard from Patti, to whom I passed along 
your recollection that this task might have been taken by her. She 
has been swamped and under a separate deadline and may or may not  be 
able to get to this.

Since I have done the revised Figure 3 and sent it out for proofing 
yesterday before adding it into Gary's edit and posting the latest 
revision (010) this morning, I believe the EDXL-DE section is all 
that remains to be done.

Just FYI, Werner did a thorough fine-tooth combing of the document 
and I have attached the version I used to keep track of each of the 
specific edits he found in addition to Alessandro's equally 
fine-toothed combing which he did before sending along his action 
items, including the Conformance Section which is the one section 
that was completely new in the revision 009 on which Gary based his 
complete check of the XML and made his last few edits.

I hope this report satisfies any lingering worries that we are not 
giving this as thorough a combing as we should, and I would hope that 
we would not need more time than this week and, perhaps the coming 
weekend to finish it and be ready to submit it to the TC at a special 
meeting next week.

Cheers,
Rex

At 10:51 AM -0500 1/21/08, Timothy Grapes wrote:
>What is the purpose of the Wed. meeting?  Status and coordination?  Or is it
>to have everyone's final read-through (against the version just sent out
>today).  I think the team needs a little time to do a fine-tooth-comb final
>read.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Tim
>
>
>
    
                                                
    
					
                                                    

        
                                                
				
    
                                                
    
                                                    
                                                        
                                                        Original Message


  • 7.  RE: [emergency-msg] Tomorrow's a Holiday Re: [emergency-msg] Figure 3 Revision

    Posted 01-21-2008 16:51 
    Hi Elysa, TC members:

I am replying to my own post to the SC EDXL-RM working group to 
update you all on the status of our work on the EDXL-RM 
specification. I wanted to make sure that no one was expecting to be 
able to vote on it in tomorrow's TC meeting. We won't know when it 
will be ready for the TC's final review until after our next SC 
meeting which we will schedule immediately after tomorrow's TC 
meeting. I have asked if Wdnesday at 4:00 pm EAstern Time is 
acceptable and some of us have indicated that it is, but we won't 
know exactly when we will submit the final revision of the 
specification to the TC to review and vote upon until this meeting.

I asked David Webber to reprise the short presentation JCAM (an open 
source application implementing the OASIS Content Assembly Mechanism 
(CAM) specification) to us tomorrow. This would be a slightly shorter 
version of the presentation on using JCAM for EDXL--HAVE that he made 
to us at the end of our face-to-face meeting Jan., 10. I would like 
to either confirm or postpone this before tomorrow's meeting, but, 
since David has joined the TC, he will get this message and any reply 
to it, thus being updated as best we can.

We are very close with EDXL-RM, but it is a complex and lengthy 
specification so if anyone wants to get a leg up on reviewing it, 
version 010 in the Emergency Message and Notification SC Document 
Repository Specifications folder. As far as I know, all that remains 
is to revise the current Section 6 Distribution of EDXL-RM and place 
it earlier in the document.

Cheers,
Rex

on At 8:39 AM -0800 1/21/08, Rex Brooks wrote:
>Hi Tim,
>
>I understand Tim. I think we should do a pulse check on this 
>Wednesday afternoon. After we confirm that the Wednesday meeting 
>time is okay immediately after the TC meeting tomorrow. I will send 
>out a request that everyone give the document as much of a review as 
>possible before Wednesday, and be ready to discuss any outstanding 
>issues, such as the status of the revised EDXL-DE/Distribution of 
>EDXL RM and set the deadline for final comments in our meeting 
>Wednesday afternoon.
>
>WRT to EDXL-DE/Distribution of EDXL RM, I asked Gary to consider 
>taking on the task before we heard from Patti, to whom I passed 
>along your recollection that this task might have been taken by her. 
>She has been swamped and under a separate deadline and may or may 
>not  be able to get to this.
>
>Since I have done the revised Figure 3 and sent it out for proofing 
>yesterday before adding it into Gary's edit and posting the latest 
>revision (010) this morning, I believe the EDXL-DE section is all 
>that remains to be done.
>
>Just FYI, Werner did a thorough fine-tooth combing of the document 
>and I have attached the version I used to keep track of each of the 
>specific edits he found in addition to Alessandro's equally 
>fine-toothed combing which he did before sending along his action 
>items, including the Conformance Section which is the one section 
>that was completely new in the revision 009 on which Gary based his 
>complete check of the XML and made his last few edits.
>
>I hope this report satisfies any lingering worries that we are not 
>giving this as thorough a combing as we should, and I would hope 
>that we would not need more time than this week and, perhaps the 
>coming weekend to finish it and be ready to submit it to the TC at a 
>special meeting next week.
>
>Cheers,
>Rex
>
>At 10:51 AM -0500 1/21/08, Timothy Grapes wrote:
>>What is the purpose of the Wed. meeting?  Status and coordination?  Or is it
>>to have everyone's final read-through (against the version just sent out
>>today).  I think the team needs a little time to do a fine-tooth-comb final
>>read.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Tim
>>
>>
>>
    
                                                
    
					
                                                    

        
                                                
				
    
                                                
    
                                                    
                                                        
                                                        Original Message


  • 8.  RE: [emergency-msg] Tomorrow's a Holiday Re: [emergency-msg] Figure 3 Revision

    Posted 01-21-2008 16:51 
    Hi Elysa, TC members:

I am replying to my own post to the SC EDXL-RM working group to 
update you all on the status of our work on the EDXL-RM 
specification. I wanted to make sure that no one was expecting to be 
able to vote on it in tomorrow's TC meeting. We won't know when it 
will be ready for the TC's final review until after our next SC 
meeting which we will schedule immediately after tomorrow's TC 
meeting. I have asked if Wdnesday at 4:00 pm EAstern Time is 
acceptable and some of us have indicated that it is, but we won't 
know exactly when we will submit the final revision of the 
specification to the TC to review and vote upon until this meeting.

I asked David Webber to reprise the short presentation JCAM (an open 
source application implementing the OASIS Content Assembly Mechanism 
(CAM) specification) to us tomorrow. This would be a slightly shorter 
version of the presentation on using JCAM for EDXL--HAVE that he made 
to us at the end of our face-to-face meeting Jan., 10. I would like 
to either confirm or postpone this before tomorrow's meeting, but, 
since David has joined the TC, he will get this message and any reply 
to it, thus being updated as best we can.

We are very close with EDXL-RM, but it is a complex and lengthy 
specification so if anyone wants to get a leg up on reviewing it, 
version 010 in the Emergency Message and Notification SC Document 
Repository Specifications folder. As far as I know, all that remains 
is to revise the current Section 6 Distribution of EDXL-RM and place 
it earlier in the document.

Cheers,
Rex

on At 8:39 AM -0800 1/21/08, Rex Brooks wrote:
>Hi Tim,
>
>I understand Tim. I think we should do a pulse check on this 
>Wednesday afternoon. After we confirm that the Wednesday meeting 
>time is okay immediately after the TC meeting tomorrow. I will send 
>out a request that everyone give the document as much of a review as 
>possible before Wednesday, and be ready to discuss any outstanding 
>issues, such as the status of the revised EDXL-DE/Distribution of 
>EDXL RM and set the deadline for final comments in our meeting 
>Wednesday afternoon.
>
>WRT to EDXL-DE/Distribution of EDXL RM, I asked Gary to consider 
>taking on the task before we heard from Patti, to whom I passed 
>along your recollection that this task might have been taken by her. 
>She has been swamped and under a separate deadline and may or may 
>not  be able to get to this.
>
>Since I have done the revised Figure 3 and sent it out for proofing 
>yesterday before adding it into Gary's edit and posting the latest 
>revision (010) this morning, I believe the EDXL-DE section is all 
>that remains to be done.
>
>Just FYI, Werner did a thorough fine-tooth combing of the document 
>and I have attached the version I used to keep track of each of the 
>specific edits he found in addition to Alessandro's equally 
>fine-toothed combing which he did before sending along his action 
>items, including the Conformance Section which is the one section 
>that was completely new in the revision 009 on which Gary based his 
>complete check of the XML and made his last few edits.
>
>I hope this report satisfies any lingering worries that we are not 
>giving this as thorough a combing as we should, and I would hope 
>that we would not need more time than this week and, perhaps the 
>coming weekend to finish it and be ready to submit it to the TC at a 
>special meeting next week.
>
>Cheers,
>Rex
>
>At 10:51 AM -0500 1/21/08, Timothy Grapes wrote:
>>What is the purpose of the Wed. meeting?  Status and coordination?  Or is it
>>to have everyone's final read-through (against the version just sent out
>>today).  I think the team needs a little time to do a fine-tooth-comb final
>>read.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Tim
>>
>>
>>
    
                                                
    
					
                                                    

        
                                                
				
    
                                                
    
                                                    
                                                        
                                                        Original Message


  • 9.  RE: [emergency-msg] Tomorrow's a Holiday Re: [emergency-msg] Figure 3 Revision

    Posted 01-21-2008 16:58 
    FYI - I have schedule a freeconference line for 11:30-12 for IF-SC 
and 2 additional hours for TC and any follow on.  Will put out an 
agenda in a bit (will plan to include Dave Webber if you still think 
that is a good idea).  We may have several new members (from DHS and 
subs) on the call tomorrow.  Elysa
PS - congrats on all the good work you have been able to turn 
around!  Amazing what yall have accomplished in the past 
month!  Maybe we can get this out to the TC for review in hopes of a 
vote by the end of the month?

At 10:39 AM 1/21/2008, Rex Brooks wrote:
>Hi Tim,
>
>I understand Tim. I think we should do a pulse check on this 
>Wednesday afternoon. After we confirm that the Wednesday meeting 
>time is okay immediately after the TC meeting tomorrow. I will send 
>out a request that everyone give the document as much of a review as 
>possible before Wednesday, and be ready to discuss any outstanding 
>issues, such as the status of the revised EDXL-DE/Distribution of 
>EDXL RM and set the deadline for final comments in our meeting 
>Wednesday afternoon.
>
>WRT to EDXL-DE/Distribution of EDXL RM, I asked Gary to consider 
>taking on the task before we heard from Patti, to whom I passed 
>along your recollection that this task might have been taken by her. 
>She has been swamped and under a separate deadline and may or may 
>not  be able to get to this.
>
>Since I have done the revised Figure 3 and sent it out for proofing 
>yesterday before adding it into Gary's edit and posting the latest 
>revision (010) this morning, I believe the EDXL-DE section is all 
>that remains to be done.
>
>Just FYI, Werner did a thorough fine-tooth combing of the document 
>and I have attached the version I used to keep track of each of the 
>specific edits he found in addition to Alessandro's equally 
>fine-toothed combing which he did before sending along his action 
>items, including the Conformance Section which is the one section 
>that was completely new in the revision 009 on which Gary based his 
>complete check of the XML and made his last few edits.
>
>I hope this report satisfies any lingering worries that we are not 
>giving this as thorough a combing as we should, and I would hope 
>that we would not need more time than this week and, perhaps the 
>coming weekend to finish it and be ready to submit it to the TC at a 
>special meeting next week.
>
>Cheers,
>Rex
>
>At 10:51 AM -0500 1/21/08, Timothy Grapes wrote:
>>What is the purpose of the Wed. meeting?  Status and coordination?  Or is it
>>to have everyone's final read-through (against the version just sent out
>>today).  I think the team needs a little time to do a fine-tooth-comb final
>>read.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Tim
>>
>>
>>
    
                                                
    
					
                                                    

        
                                                
				
    
                                                
    
                                                    
                                                        
                                                        Original Message


  • 10.  RE: [emergency-msg] Tomorrow's a Holiday Re: [emergency-msg] Figure 3 Revision

    Posted 01-21-2008 17:13 
    Thanks Elysa,

I do think it is a good idea to include David Webber's presentation. 
I suspect we can manage to get it out before the end of the month, by 
a day or two. ;-)

Cheers,
Rex

At 10:55 AM -0600 1/21/08, Elysa Jones wrote:
>FYI - I have schedule a freeconference line for 11:30-12 for IF-SC 
>and 2 additional hours for TC and any follow on.  Will put out an 
>agenda in a bit (will plan to include Dave Webber if you still think 
>that is a good idea).  We may have several new members (from DHS and 
>subs) on the call tomorrow.  Elysa
>PS - congrats on all the good work you have been able to turn 
>around!  Amazing what yall have accomplished in the past month! 
>Maybe we can get this out to the TC for review in hopes of a vote by 
>the end of the month?
>
>At 10:39 AM 1/21/2008, Rex Brooks wrote:
>>Hi Tim,
>>
>>I understand Tim. I think we should do a pulse check on this 
>>Wednesday afternoon. After we confirm that the Wednesday meeting 
>>time is okay immediately after the TC meeting tomorrow. I will send 
>>out a request that everyone give the document as much of a review 
>>as possible before Wednesday, and be ready to discuss any 
>>outstanding issues, such as the status of the revised 
>>EDXL-DE/Distribution of EDXL RM and set the deadline for final 
>>comments in our meeting Wednesday afternoon.
>>
>>WRT to EDXL-DE/Distribution of EDXL RM, I asked Gary to consider 
>>taking on the task before we heard from Patti, to whom I passed 
>>along your recollection that this task might have been taken by 
>>her. She has been swamped and under a separate deadline and may or 
>>may not  be able to get to this.
>>
>>Since I have done the revised Figure 3 and sent it out for proofing 
>>yesterday before adding it into Gary's edit and posting the latest 
>>revision (010) this morning, I believe the EDXL-DE section is all 
>>that remains to be done.
>>
>>Just FYI, Werner did a thorough fine-tooth combing of the document 
>>and I have attached the version I used to keep track of each of the 
>>specific edits he found in addition to Alessandro's equally 
>>fine-toothed combing which he did before sending along his action 
>>items, including the Conformance Section which is the one section 
>>that was completely new in the revision 009 on which Gary based his 
>>complete check of the XML and made his last few edits.
>>
>>I hope this report satisfies any lingering worries that we are not 
>>giving this as thorough a combing as we should, and I would hope 
>>that we would not need more time than this week and, perhaps the 
>>coming weekend to finish it and be ready to submit it to the TC at 
>>a special meeting next week.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Rex
>>
>>At 10:51 AM -0500 1/21/08, Timothy Grapes wrote:
>>>What is the purpose of the Wed. meeting?  Status and coordination?  Or is it
>>>to have everyone's final read-through (against the version just sent out
>>>today).  I think the team needs a little time to do a fine-tooth-comb final
>>>read.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>Tim
>>>
>>>
>>>
    
                                                
    
					
                                                    

        
                                                
				
    
                                                
    
                                                    
                                                        
                                                        Original Message


Related Content