I think we can leave out dlhead - that both makes it simpler, and makes it more in line with the HTML5 dl tag. If someone wants a dl with a heading, they can still create a two column table. That also allows us to change the content model of <dl> to choice, to match our other list entries. And then the content model problem for Birgit's specialization disappears - I think. Michael Priestley, Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM) Enterprise Content Technology Strategist
mpriestl@ca.ibm.com From: Mark Giffin <
mark@markgiffin.com> To: "dita-lightweight-dita@lists.oasis-open.org" <
dita-lightweight-dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Date: 01/23/2017 02:09 PM Subject: [dita-lightweight-dita] dl element Sent by: <
dita-lightweight-dita@lists.oasis-open.org> We just discussed this in the meeting. In the lwdita DTDs, the dlhead element is not defined. But dlhead is defined in the main DITA DTDs. I think leaving this out this was an oversight on my part, because I don't think we ever discussed removing dlhead. Therefore I will add dlhead to the lwdita DTDs. Unless someone informs me why I should not. Mark Giffin Mark Giffin Consulting, Inc.
http://markgiffin.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php