OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

  • 1.  Re: [office] OpenDocument v1.2 draft 5

    Posted 08-23-2007 15:46
    Hi all,
    
    we made incompatible changes to the numbering anyway. So I see no reason why we can't change it.
    
    ~Florian
    
    >>> Michael Brauer 


  • 2.  Re: [office] OpenDocument v1.2 draft 5

    Posted 08-23-2007 22:35
    On Thursday 23 August 2007 17:45:58 Florian Reuter wrote:
    > we made incompatible changes to the numbering anyway. So I see no
    > reason why we can't change it.
    
    what does the topic of headers have to do with the topic of lists ?
    
    Well, apart from looking similar on screen, but that's quite irrelevant 
    for the subject at hand ;)
    -- 
    Thomas Zander
    


  • 3.  Re: [office] OpenDocument v1.2 draft 5

    Posted 08-23-2007 23:16


    On 8/23/07, Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> wrote:
    On Thursday 23 August 2007 17:45:58 Florian Reuter wrote:
    > we made incompatible changes to the numbering anyway. So I see no
    > reason why we can't change it.

    what does the topic of headers have to do with the topic of lists ?

    The TC already broke compatibility with ODF 1.1 and 1.0 with the list enhancement amendment. So I interpret what Florian said as simply noting that more incompatibilities are merely cumulative.
     
    BTW, how are you coming on that research you began months ago on whether the List Enhancement Amendment in fact broke interop? Have you yet found a solution for my use case, the multiple app round trip with some apps supporting only list tuples and some supporting list triples, using only what is defined in the ODF 1.2 draft specification (no application level hacks)?

    Well, apart from looking similar on screen, but that's quite irrelevant
    for the subject at hand ;)

    Not unless you've got newly discovered evidence that the List Enhancement Amendment did not in fact break interoperability. So what's the KDE solution to my use case, Thomas? Or is your research still too preliminary to discuss?

    Best regards,

    Marbux



  • 4.  Re: [office] OpenDocument v1.2 draft 5

    Posted 08-24-2007 07:11
    On Friday 24 August 2007 01:15:47 you wrote:
    > BTW, how are you coming on that research you began months ago on
    > whether the List Enhancement Amendment in fact broke interop?
    
    1. the theoretical model was already clear, there is no interop problem.
    
    2. you had doubts based on someone saying otherwise
    
    3. I offered to do a usecase research to ease your mind
    
    4. you made very clear you rejected the proposal with or without proof 
    otherwise, and you made clear that any research from my side was not 
    going to change your mind.
    
    -- 
    Thomas Zander