OASIS Business Document Exchange (BDXR) TC

Back to discussions
Expand all | Collapse all

Additional editorial comments to SMP 1.0 CSPRD02

  • 1.  Additional editorial comments to SMP 1.0 CSPRD02

    Posted 05-22-2016 17:47




    Dear all
     
    While preparing for our meeting on Wednesday I identified some additional (purely editorial) issues with SMP 1.0 CSPRD02:
     
    1) Section 2.3.3.2: The line numbering has not been reset, but continues the line numbering from 2.3.2.2. First line should be “01”.
     
    2) Section 2.4.7.1: In the HTML version ( http://docs.oasis-open.org/bdxr/bdx-smp/v1.0/csprd02/bdx-smp-v1.0-csprd02.html)
    and PDF version ( http://docs.oasis-open.org/bdxr/bdx-smp/v1.0/csprd02/bdx-smp-v1.0-csprd02.pdf) , the pseudo-schema has line numbering (labelling the single line as
    line “04”). The normative (Word) version does not.
     
    3) When we added section 3.2.1 we created a hanging paragraph in 3.2.
     
    4) Section 3.2.1: In the HTML version ( http://docs.oasis-open.org/bdxr/bdx-smp/v1.0/csprd02/bdx-smp-v1.0-csprd02.html)
    and PDF version ( http://docs.oasis-open.org/bdxr/bdx-smp/v1.0/csprd02/bdx-smp-v1.0-csprd02.pdf) , the samples have line numbering (labelling the single lines “05” and
    “06” respectively). The normative (Word) version does not.
     
    5) Section 3.4 has a hanging paragraph.
     
    6) Appendix C3: Line numbering has not been reset, but continues the line numbering from the example in C2. First line should be “01”.
     
    7) Appendix D (Revision History) should be labelled “non-normative” for consistency (or should be removed entirely, contemplating that the next Committee Specification will be SMP 1.0 Candidate OASIS Standard).
     
    I’m adding the above to a new comment resolution log document, which I will upload in a bit.
     
    Best regards,
     
    Kenneth
     






Related Content