MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















office message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [office] Formula Sub Committee Draft Charter




From: Lars Oppermann <Lars.Oppermann@Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 17:34:23 +0100






robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote:
 > ...
> Is there any value of N in the above proposal which you would find 
> satisfactory?  In other words, are you willing to make a best-attempt at 
> convincing and turning around OASIS on this point, but then, after a 
> certain date, be willing to cut your losses and make up lost time on the 
> Subcommittee if that fails? I'd be pleased if we all agreed on the 
> general outline of the above proposal, but differed in preferences for 
> N.  That at least gives a point for negotiation.  In the end, I'm 
> willing to be open minded, but not willing to be open ended.

I wholeheartedly agree to this. We cannot reach our goal of defining 
formulas for OpenDocument, which already is an OASIS standard under 
OASIS IPR rules by debating those very rules.

Bests
-Lars


-- 
Lars Oppermann <lars.oppermann@sun.com>               Sun Microsystems
Software Engineer - StarOffice                           Sachsenfeld 4
Phone: +49 40 23646 959                                D-20097 Hamburg
Fax:   +49 40 23646 550                  http://www.sun.com/staroffice








References:

Re: [office] Formula Sub Committee Draft Charter
From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]