OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC

  • 1.  XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update

    Posted 02-08-2017 19:43
    Dear all,   Following the suggestions given during yesterday’s meeting, I have included the questions on the ITS module to the SOU questionnaire: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21 Please let me know if you have any further suggestions/feedback on the questionnaire.   Best,   Lucia     De : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org] De la part de Lucia Morado Vazquez Envoyé : mardi 20 décembre 2016 16:31 À : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Objet : [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft   Dear all,   Here is the link to the new questionnaire (draft) to collect the SOU of the new version. https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21 I have modified the one we used for 2.0 to adapt it to the new spec. On the first page, there are two elements in red that need to be updated. For the ITS module, I could not think of an effective and simple way of adding additional questions to gather more information than the general support of the module, if you can think of any method to do it (without overcomplicating the questionnaire) please let me know. Let me know if you have any suggestion/remark on the questionnaire itself.   Best, Lucía      


  • 2.  Re: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update

    Posted 02-21-2017 16:02
    Lucía, all, finally finding some time to review this Links in Q1 should be changed to cs01 links E.g.  Date TBD by now http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/cs01/xliff-core-v2.1-cs01.html The latest link should be http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/xliff-core-v2.1.html 3 .   Are you an OASIS member? should be 3 .   Are you an OASIS member or an employee of an OASIS member organization? Q4 second line should be I am an Individual member or an associated member Chet clarified that asscociated members are not considered pripreps. For both Individual and Associated members it is sufficient to receive the statement from them individually 11 .   Contact Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers, not for publication) should be 11 .   Contact Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers IF NECESSARY, not for publication) Q15 should use another example, as sdlxliff is an XLIFF 1.2 extension @Bryan, @Yves do you want to name your extended namespace examples? More comments will follow tomorrow Cheers dF Dr. David Filip =========== OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer Spokes Research Fellow ADAPT Centre KDEG, Trinity College Dublin Mobile: +420-777-218-122 On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch > wrote: Dear all,   Following the suggestions given during yesterday’s meeting, I have included the questions on the ITS module to the SOU questionnaire: https://www.surveymonkey.com/ r/souxliff21 Please let me know if you have any further suggestions/feedback on the questionnaire.   Best,   Lucia     De : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto: xliff@lists.oasis- open.org ] De la part de Lucia Morado Vazquez Envoyé : mardi 20 décembre 2016 16:31 À : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Objet : [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft   Dear all,   Here is the link to the new questionnaire (draft) to collect the SOU of the new version. https://www.surveymonkey.com/ r/souxliff21 I have modified the one we used for 2.0 to adapt it to the new spec. On the first page, there are two elements in red that need to be updated. For the ITS module, I could not think of an effective and simple way of adding additional questions to gather more information than the general support of the module, if you can think of any method to do it (without overcomplicating the questionnaire) please let me know. Let me know if you have any suggestion/remark on the questionnaire itself.   Best, Lucía      


  • 3.  Re: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update

    Posted 02-21-2017 18:03
    Hi all, continued feedback to the questionnaire Q25. Change Tracking Module 2.1 [Change Tracking Module 2.0 was deprecated] Q58. shouldn't use radio buttons as multiple selections desirable, should use checkbox(es) But id, type, and translate are all from core (xlf) so shouldn't be re-asked here. The only new attribute specific for the ITS Tools Annotation is  its:annotatorsRef So in the end it should be just one checkbox for that attribute Q60 same as Q58 Should have just one checkbox for its:allowedCharacters Q62 same as Q58 and Q60 Should have just one checkbox for itsm:domains Q64 shouldn't use radio buttons as multiple selections desirable, should use checkbox(es) Just two checkboxes: its: localeFilterList its:localeFilterType Q66 Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core Q68 Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core Q69 Analyis -> Analysis Q70 Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core Q71-Q73 should be removed Maybe replace with Q71 Can your tool roundtrip ITS Localization Note data using XLIFF Core Note and XLIFF Core Comment Annotation Q74 Does your tool support the Terminology data category? should be Does your tool FULLY support the Terminology data category? Q75 There should be checkboxes just for the its: attributes + there also needs to be a checkox for  type="its:term-no" [not just for the core type unspecified] Q77 Just one checkbox for  itsm:lang Q79 Checkboxes just for the its: attributes Q81 Checkboxes just for the its: attributes This is now my complete feedback When all fixed, the SOU questionnaire will be ready to launch Cheers dF Dr. David Filip =========== OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer Spokes Research Fellow ADAPT Centre KDEG, Trinity College Dublin Mobile: +420-777-218-122 On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:01 PM, David Filip < david.filip@adaptcentre.ie > wrote: Lucía, all, finally finding some time to review this Links in Q1 should be changed to cs01 links E.g.  Date TBD by now http://docs.oasis-open.org/ xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/cs01/ xliff-core-v2.1-cs01.html The latest link should be http://docs.oasis-open.org/ xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/xliff- core-v2.1.html 3 .   Are you an OASIS member? should be 3 .   Are you an OASIS member or an employee of an OASIS member organization? Q4 second line should be I am an Individual member or an associated member Chet clarified that asscociated members are not considered pripreps. For both Individual and Associated members it is sufficient to receive the statement from them individually 11 .   Contact Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers, not for publication) should be 11 .   Contact Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers IF NECESSARY, not for publication) Q15 should use another example, as sdlxliff is an XLIFF 1.2 extension @Bryan, @Yves do you want to name your extended namespace examples? More comments will follow tomorrow Cheers dF Dr. David Filip =========== OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer Spokes Research Fellow ADAPT Centre KDEG, Trinity College Dublin Mobile: +420-777-218-122 On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch > wrote: Dear all,   Following the suggestions given during yesterday’s meeting, I have included the questions on the ITS module to the SOU questionnaire: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r /souxliff21 Please let me know if you have any further suggestions/feedback on the questionnaire.   Best,   Lucia     De : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto: xliff@lists.oasis-open .org ] De la part de Lucia Morado Vazquez Envoyé : mardi 20 décembre 2016 16:31 À : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Objet : [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft   Dear all,   Here is the link to the new questionnaire (draft) to collect the SOU of the new version. https://www.surveymonkey.com/r /souxliff21 I have modified the one we used for 2.0 to adapt it to the new spec. On the first page, there are two elements in red that need to be updated. For the ITS module, I could not think of an effective and simple way of adding additional questions to gather more information than the general support of the module, if you can think of any method to do it (without overcomplicating the questionnaire) please let me know. Let me know if you have any suggestion/remark on the questionnaire itself.   Best, Lucía      


  • 4.  RE: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update

    Posted 02-24-2017 13:09




    Dear David, all,
     
    Thank you very much for your feedback.
    I have implemented your suggestions.
     
    https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21

     
    In the ITS section, we have now cases where there is only one attribute to be selected. The normal formulation for introducing that question implied several possible
    answers ("Please select from the following attributes the ones that your tool can process:"). Should we leave it like this for consistency or should I change the formulation of the question? (e.g. Can your tool process the X attribute?)
     
    One of David’s suggestions is still not modified:
     
    >>Q15 should use another example, as sdlxliff is an XLIFF 1.2 extension
    >>@Bryan, @Yves do you want to name your extended namespace examples?
     
    Please let me know if you have any more feedback.
    Best,
    Lucía
     
     
    De : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org]
    De la part de David Filip
    Envoyé : mardi 21 février 2017 19:02
    À : Lucia Morado Vazquez <Lucia.Morado@unige.ch>; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Objet : Re: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update
     

    Hi all,

     


    continued feedback to the questionnaire


     


    Q25.


     


    Change Tracking Module 2.1 [Change Tracking Module 2.0 was deprecated]


     


    Q58.


     


    shouldn't use radio buttons as multiple selections desirable, should use checkbox(es)


     


    But id, type, and translate are all from core (xlf) so shouldn't be re-asked here.


    The only new attribute specific for the ITS Tools Annotation is  its:annotatorsRef


    So in the end it should be just one checkbox for that attribute


     


    Q60


    same as Q58


    Should have just one checkbox for its:allowedCharacters


     



    Q62


    same as Q58 and Q60


    Should have just one checkbox for itsm:domains



     


    Q64


    shouldn't use radio buttons as multiple selections desirable, should use checkbox(es)


    Just two checkboxes:


    its: localeFilterList


    its:localeFilterType


     


    Q66


    Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core


     


     



    Q68


    Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core



     


    Q69


    Analyis -> Analysis


     




    Q70


    Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core




     


     


    Q71-Q73 should be removed


     


    Maybe replace with


     


    Q71


    Can your tool roundtrip ITS Localization Note data using XLIFF Core Note and XLIFF Core Comment Annotation


     


     


    Q74



    Does your tool support the Terminology data category?


    should be
    Does your tool FULLY support the Terminology data category?

     


    Q75


     


    There should be checkboxes just for the its: attributes


    + there also needs to be a checkox for 


    type="its:term-no"


    [not just for the core type unspecified]


     


    Q77


    Just one checkbox for 


    itsm:lang


     


    Q79


    Checkboxes just for the its: attributes


     


    Q81


    Checkboxes just for the its: attributes


     


     


    This is now my complete feedback


     


    When all fixed, the SOU questionnaire will be ready to launch


     


    Cheers dF


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     



     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     














    Dr. David Filip

    ===========


    OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair


    OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer


    Spokes Research Fellow


    ADAPT Centre


    KDEG, Trinity College Dublin


    Mobile: +420-777-218-122


     










     

    On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:01 PM, David Filip < david.filip@adaptcentre.ie > wrote:


    Lucía, all,

     


    finally finding some time to review this


     


     


    Links in Q1


    should be changed to cs01 links


    E.g. 


    Date TBD by now



    http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/cs01/xliff-core-v2.1-cs01.html


     


    The latest link should be


    http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/xliff-core-v2.1.html


     


     


     



    3 .   Are
    you an OASIS member?


     


    should be


     


     



    3 .   Are
    you an OASIS member or an employee of an OASIS member organization?

     


    Q4


    second line should be


    I am an Individual member or an associated member

    Chet clarified that asscociated members are not considered pripreps. For both Individual and Associated members it is sufficient
    to receive the statement from them individually


     


     



    11 .   Contact
    Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers, not for publication)

    should be



    11 .   Contact
    Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers IF NECESSARY, not for publication)

     


    Q15 should use another example, as sdlxliff is an XLIFF 1.2 extension


    @Bryan, @Yves do you want to name your extended namespace examples?


     


    More comments will follow tomorrow


     


    Cheers


    dF


     


     
















    Dr. David Filip

    ===========


    OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair


    OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer


    Spokes Research Fellow


    ADAPT Centre


    KDEG, Trinity College Dublin


    Mobile:
    +420-777-218-122


     












     

    On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch > wrote:



    Dear all,
     
    Following the suggestions given during yesterday’s meeting, I have included the questions on the ITS module to the SOU questionnaire:
    https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21
    Please let me know if you have any further suggestions/feedback on the questionnaire.
     
    Best,
     
    Lucia
     
     


    De :
    xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ]
    De la part de Lucia Morado Vazquez
    Envoyé : mardi 20 décembre 2016 16:31
    À : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Objet : [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft


     
    Dear all,
     
    Here is the link to the new questionnaire (draft) to collect the SOU of the new version.

    https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21
    I have modified the one we used for 2.0 to adapt it to the new spec.
    On the first page, there are two elements in red that need to be updated.

    For the ITS module, I could not think of an effective and simple way of adding additional questions to gather more information than the general support of the module, if you can
    think of any method to do it (without overcomplicating the questionnaire) please let me know.
    Let me know if you have any suggestion/remark on the questionnaire itself.
     
    Best,
    Lucía
     
     
     




     





     







  • 5.  Re: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update

    Posted 02-27-2017 09:09
    Hi Lucía, it doesn't let me retake the survey.. strange not sure how it even knows? Dr. David Filip =========== OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer Spokes Research Fellow ADAPT Centre KDEG, Trinity College Dublin Mobile: +420-777-218-122 On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch > wrote: Dear David, all,   Thank you very much for your feedback. I have implemented your suggestions.   https://www.surveymonkey.com/ r/souxliff21   In the ITS section, we have now cases where there is only one attribute to be selected. The normal formulation for introducing that question implied several possible answers ("Please select from the following attributes the ones that your tool can process:"). Should we leave it like this for consistency or should I change the formulation of the question? (e.g. Can your tool process the X attribute?)   One of David’s suggestions is still not modified:   >>Q15 should use another example, as sdlxliff is an XLIFF 1.2 extension >>@Bryan, @Yves do you want to name your extended namespace examples?   Please let me know if you have any more feedback. Best, Lucía     De : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto: xliff@lists.oasis- open.org ] De la part de David Filip Envoyé : mardi 21 février 2017 19:02 À : Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch >; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Objet : Re: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update   Hi all,   continued feedback to the questionnaire   Q25.   Change Tracking Module 2.1 [Change Tracking Module 2.0 was deprecated]   Q58.   shouldn't use radio buttons as multiple selections desirable, should use checkbox(es)   But id, type, and translate are all from core (xlf) so shouldn't be re-asked here. The only new attribute specific for the ITS Tools Annotation is  its:annotatorsRef So in the end it should be just one checkbox for that attribute   Q60 same as Q58 Should have just one checkbox for its:allowedCharacters   Q62 same as Q58 and Q60 Should have just one checkbox for itsm:domains   Q64 shouldn't use radio buttons as multiple selections desirable, should use checkbox(es) Just two checkboxes: its: localeFilterList its:localeFilterType   Q66 Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core     Q68 Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core   Q69 Analyis -> Analysis   Q70 Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core     Q71-Q73 should be removed   Maybe replace with   Q71 Can your tool roundtrip ITS Localization Note data using XLIFF Core Note and XLIFF Core Comment Annotation     Q74 Does your tool support the Terminology data category? should be Does your tool FULLY support the Terminology data category?   Q75   There should be checkboxes just for the its: attributes + there also needs to be a checkox for  type="its:term-no" [not just for the core type unspecified]   Q77 Just one checkbox for  itsm:lang   Q79 Checkboxes just for the its: attributes   Q81 Checkboxes just for the its: attributes     This is now my complete feedback   When all fixed, the SOU questionnaire will be ready to launch   Cheers dF                                                           Dr. David Filip =========== OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer Spokes Research Fellow ADAPT Centre KDEG, Trinity College Dublin Mobile: +420-777-218-122     On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:01 PM, David Filip < david.filip@adaptcentre.ie > wrote: Lucía, all,   finally finding some time to review this     Links in Q1 should be changed to cs01 links E.g.  Date TBD by now http://docs.oasis-open.org/ xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/cs01/ xliff-core-v2.1-cs01.html   The latest link should be http://docs.oasis-open.org/ xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/xliff- core-v2.1.html       3 .   Are you an OASIS member?   should be     3 .   Are you an OASIS member or an employee of an OASIS member organization?   Q4 second line should be I am an Individual member or an associated member Chet clarified that asscociated members are not considered pripreps. For both Individual and Associated members it is sufficient to receive the statement from them individually     11 .   Contact Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers, not for publication) should be 11 .   Contact Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers IF NECESSARY, not for publication)   Q15 should use another example, as sdlxliff is an XLIFF 1.2 extension @Bryan, @Yves do you want to name your extended namespace examples?   More comments will follow tomorrow   Cheers dF     Dr. David Filip =========== OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer Spokes Research Fellow ADAPT Centre KDEG, Trinity College Dublin Mobile: +420-777-218-122     On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch > wrote: Dear all,   Following the suggestions given during yesterday’s meeting, I have included the questions on the ITS module to the SOU questionnaire: https://www.surveymonkey.com/ r/souxliff21 Please let me know if you have any further suggestions/feedback on the questionnaire.   Best,   Lucia     De : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto: xliff@lists.oasis- open.org ] De la part de Lucia Morado Vazquez Envoyé : mardi 20 décembre 2016 16:31 À : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Objet : [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft   Dear all,   Here is the link to the new questionnaire (draft) to collect the SOU of the new version. https://www.surveymonkey.com/ r/souxliff21 I have modified the one we used for 2.0 to adapt it to the new spec. On the first page, there are two elements in red that need to be updated. For the ITS module, I could not think of an effective and simple way of adding additional questions to gather more information than the general support of the module, if you can think of any method to do it (without overcomplicating the questionnaire) please let me know. Let me know if you have any suggestion/remark on the questionnaire itself.   Best, Lucía          


  • 6.  RE: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update

    Posted 02-27-2017 17:24




    Dear David,
     
    Thank you for your message. I have just change the settings of the survey . The survey can be taken more than once from the same device.
     
    Best,
     
    Luc ía
     
     
     
    De : David Filip [mailto:david.filip@adaptcentre.ie]

    Envoyé : lundi 27 février 2017 10:08
    À : Lucia Morado Vazquez <Lucia.Morado@unige.ch>
    Cc : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Objet : Re: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update
     

    Hi Lucía,

     


    it doesn't let me retake the survey.. strange not sure how it even knows?














    Dr. David Filip

    ===========


    OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair


    OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer


    Spokes Research Fellow


    ADAPT Centre


    KDEG, Trinity College Dublin


    Mobile: +420-777-218-122


     










     

    On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch > wrote:



    Dear David, all,
     
    Thank you very much for your feedback. I have implemented your suggestions.
     
    https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21

     
    In the ITS section, we have now cases where there is only one attribute to be selected. The normal
    formulation for introducing that question implied several possible answers ("Please select from the following attributes the ones that your tool can process:"). Should we leave it like this for consistency or should I change the formulation of the question?
    (e.g. Can your tool process the X attribute?)
     
    One of David’s suggestions is still not modified:
     

    >>Q15 should use another example, as sdlxliff is an XLIFF 1.2 extension

    >>@Bryan, @Yves do you want to name your extended namespace examples?
     
    Please let me know if you have any more feedback.
    Best,
    Lucía
     
     
    De :
    xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ]
    De la part de David Filip
    Envoyé : mardi 21 février 2017 19:02
    À : Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch >;
    xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Objet : Re: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update


     

    Hi all,

     


    continued feedback to the questionnaire


     


    Q25.


     


    Change Tracking Module 2.1 [Change Tracking Module 2.0 was deprecated]


     


    Q58.


     


    shouldn't use radio buttons as multiple selections desirable, should use checkbox(es)


     


    But id, type, and translate are all from core (xlf) so shouldn't be re-asked here.


    The only new attribute specific for the ITS Tools Annotation is  its:annotatorsRef


    So in the end it should be just one checkbox for that attribute


     


    Q60


    same as Q58


    Should have just one checkbox for its:allowedCharacters


     



    Q62


    same as Q58 and Q60


    Should have just one checkbox for itsm:domains



     


    Q64


    shouldn't use radio buttons as multiple selections desirable, should use checkbox(es)


    Just two checkboxes:


    its: localeFilterList


    its:localeFilterType


     


    Q66


    Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core


     


     



    Q68


    Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core



     


    Q69


    Analyis -> Analysis


     




    Q70


    Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core




     


     


    Q71-Q73 should be removed


     


    Maybe replace with


     


    Q71


    Can your tool roundtrip ITS Localization Note data using XLIFF Core Note and XLIFF Core Comment Annotation


     


     


    Q74



    Does your tool support the Terminology data category?


    should be
    Does your tool FULLY support the Terminology data category?

     


    Q75


     


    There should be checkboxes just for the its: attributes


    + there also needs to be a checkox for 


    type="its:term-no"


    [not just for the core type unspecified]


     


    Q77


    Just one checkbox for 


    itsm:lang


     


    Q79


    Checkboxes just for the its: attributes


     


    Q81


    Checkboxes just for the its: attributes


     


     


    This is now my complete feedback


     


    When all fixed, the SOU questionnaire will be ready to launch


     


    Cheers dF


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     



     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     














    Dr. David Filip

    ===========


    OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair


    OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer


    Spokes Research Fellow


    ADAPT Centre


    KDEG, Trinity College Dublin


    Mobile:
    +420-777-218-122


     










     

    On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:01 PM, David Filip < david.filip@adaptcentre.ie > wrote:


    Lucía, all,

     


    finally finding some time to review this


     


     


    Links in Q1


    should be changed to cs01 links


    E.g. 


    Date TBD by now



    http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/cs01/xliff-core-v2.1-cs01.html


     


    The latest link should be


    http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/xliff-core-v2.1.html


     


     


     



    3 .   Are
    you an OASIS member?


     


    should be


     


     



    3 .   Are
    you an OASIS member or an employee of an OASIS member organization?

     


    Q4


    second line should be


    I
    am an Individual member or an associated member

    Chet clarified that asscociated members are not
    considered pripreps. For both Individual and Associated members it is sufficient to receive the statement from them individually


     


     



    11 .   Contact
    Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers, not for publication)

    should be



    11 .   Contact
    Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers IF NECESSARY, not for publication)

     


    Q15 should use another example, as sdlxliff is
    an XLIFF 1.2 extension


    @Bryan, @Yves do you want to name your extended
    namespace examples?


     


    More comments will follow tomorrow


     


    Cheers


    dF


     


     
















    Dr. David Filip

    ===========


    OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair


    OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer


    Spokes Research Fellow


    ADAPT Centre


    KDEG, Trinity College Dublin


    Mobile:
    +420-777-218-122


     












     

    On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch > wrote:



    Dear all,
     
    Following the suggestions given during yesterday’s meeting, I have included the questions on the ITS module to the SOU questionnaire:
    https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21
    Please let me know if you have any further suggestions/feedback on the questionnaire.
     
    Best,
     
    Lucia
     
     


    De :
    xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ]
    De la part de Lucia Morado Vazquez
    Envoyé : mardi 20 décembre 2016 16:31
    À : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Objet : [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft


     
    Dear all,
     
    Here is the link to the new questionnaire (draft) to collect the SOU of the new version.

    https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21
    I have modified the one we used for 2.0 to adapt it to the new spec.
    On the first page, there are two elements in red that need to be updated.

    For the ITS module, I could not think of an effective and simple way of adding additional questions to gather more information than the general support of the module, if you can
    think of any method to do it (without overcomplicating the questionnaire) please let me know.
    Let me know if you have any suggestion/remark on the questionnaire itself.
     
    Best,
    Lucía
     
     
     




     





     







     







  • 7.  Re: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update

    Posted 03-07-2017 15:02
    Hi Lucía, Q71 the first cehckbox should be type=" its:term-no " not just its:term-no, this not an attribute just an ITS specific core attribute value  Other than this one, it looks good Cheers and thanks dF  Dr. David Filip =========== OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer Spokes Research Fellow ADAPT Centre KDEG, Trinity College Dublin Mobile: +420-777-218-122 On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch > wrote: Dear David,   Thank you for your message. I have just change the settings of the survey . The survey can be taken more than once from the same device.   Best,   Luc ía       De : David Filip [mailto: david.filip@ adaptcentre.ie ] Envoyé : lundi 27 février 2017 10:08 À : Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch > Cc : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Objet : Re: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update   Hi Lucía,   it doesn't let me retake the survey.. strange not sure how it even knows? Dr. David Filip =========== OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer Spokes Research Fellow ADAPT Centre KDEG, Trinity College Dublin Mobile: +420-777-218-122     On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch > wrote: Dear David, all,   Thank you very much for your feedback. I have implemented your suggestions.   https://www.surveymonkey.com/ r/souxliff21   In the ITS section, we have now cases where there is only one attribute to be selected. The normal formulation for introducing that question implied several possible answers ("Please select from the following attributes the ones that your tool can process:"). Should we leave it like this for consistency or should I change the formulation of the question? (e.g. Can your tool process the X attribute?)   One of David’s suggestions is still not modified:   >>Q15 should use another example, as sdlxliff is an XLIFF 1.2 extension >>@Bryan, @Yves do you want to name your extended namespace examples?   Please let me know if you have any more feedback. Best, Lucía     De : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto: xliff@lists.oasis- open.org ] De la part de David Filip Envoyé : mardi 21 février 2017 19:02 À : Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch >; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Objet : Re: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update   Hi all,   continued feedback to the questionnaire   Q25.   Change Tracking Module 2.1 [Change Tracking Module 2.0 was deprecated]   Q58.   shouldn't use radio buttons as multiple selections desirable, should use checkbox(es)   But id, type, and translate are all from core (xlf) so shouldn't be re-asked here. The only new attribute specific for the ITS Tools Annotation is  its:annotatorsRef So in the end it should be just one checkbox for that attribute   Q60 same as Q58 Should have just one checkbox for its:allowedCharacters   Q62 same as Q58 and Q60 Should have just one checkbox for itsm:domains   Q64 shouldn't use radio buttons as multiple selections desirable, should use checkbox(es) Just two checkboxes: its: localeFilterList its:localeFilterType   Q66 Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core     Q68 Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core   Q69 Analyis -> Analysis   Q70 Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core     Q71-Q73 should be removed   Maybe replace with   Q71 Can your tool roundtrip ITS Localization Note data using XLIFF Core Note and XLIFF Core Comment Annotation     Q74 Does your tool support the Terminology data category? should be Does your tool FULLY support the Terminology data category?   Q75   There should be checkboxes just for the its: attributes + there also needs to be a checkox for  type="its:term-no" [not just for the core type unspecified]   Q77 Just one checkbox for  itsm:lang   Q79 Checkboxes just for the its: attributes   Q81 Checkboxes just for the its: attributes     This is now my complete feedback   When all fixed, the SOU questionnaire will be ready to launch   Cheers dF                                                           Dr. David Filip =========== OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer Spokes Research Fellow ADAPT Centre KDEG, Trinity College Dublin Mobile: +420-777-218-122     On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:01 PM, David Filip < david.filip@adaptcentre.ie > wrote: Lucía, all,   finally finding some time to review this     Links in Q1 should be changed to cs01 links E.g.  Date TBD by now http://docs.oasis-open.org/ xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/cs01/ xliff-core-v2.1-cs01.html   The latest link should be http://docs.oasis-open.org/ xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/xliff- core-v2.1.html       3 .   Are you an OASIS member?   should be     3 .   Are you an OASIS member or an employee of an OASIS member organization?   Q4 second line should be I am an Individual member or an associated member Chet clarified that asscociated members are not considered pripreps. For both Individual and Associated members it is sufficient to receive the statement from them individually     11 .   Contact Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers, not for publication) should be 11 .   Contact Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers IF NECESSARY, not for publication)   Q15 should use another example, as sdlxliff is an XLIFF 1.2 extension @Bryan, @Yves do you want to name your extended namespace examples?   More comments will follow tomorrow   Cheers dF     Dr. David Filip =========== OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer Spokes Research Fellow ADAPT Centre KDEG, Trinity College Dublin Mobile: +420-777-218-122     On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch > wrote: Dear all,   Following the suggestions given during yesterday’s meeting, I have included the questions on the ITS module to the SOU questionnaire: https://www.surveymonkey.com/ r/souxliff21 Please let me know if you have any further suggestions/feedback on the questionnaire.   Best,   Lucia     De : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto: xliff@lists.oasis- open.org ] De la part de Lucia Morado Vazquez Envoyé : mardi 20 décembre 2016 16:31 À : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Objet : [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft   Dear all,   Here is the link to the new questionnaire (draft) to collect the SOU of the new version. https://www.surveymonkey.com/ r/souxliff21 I have modified the one we used for 2.0 to adapt it to the new spec. On the first page, there are two elements in red that need to be updated. For the ITS module, I could not think of an effective and simple way of adding additional questions to gather more information than the general support of the module, if you can think of any method to do it (without overcomplicating the questionnaire) please let me know. Let me know if you have any suggestion/remark on the questionnaire itself.   Best, Lucía            


  • 8.  RE: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update

    Posted 04-07-2017 09:39




    Dear all,
     
    As discussed in the last TC meeting, I have just applied the changes related to the new draft in the survey.
    https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21

    Please let me know if you have any further feedback on it.
     
    Thanks and have a nice weekend,
     
    Luc ía
     


    De : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org]
    De la part de Lucia Morado Vazquez
    Envoyé : lundi, 27 février 2017 18:24
    À : David Filip <david.filip@adaptcentre.ie>
    Cc : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Objet : RE: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update


     
    Dear David,
     
    Thank you for your message. I have just changed the settings of the survey . The survey can be taken more than once from
    the same device.
     
    Best,
     
    Luc ía
     
     
     
    De : David Filip [ mailto:david.filip@adaptcentre.ie ]

    Envoyé : lundi 27 février 2017 10:08
    À : Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch >
    Cc : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Objet : Re: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update
     

    Hi Lucía,

     


    it doesn't let me retake the survey.. strange not sure how it even knows?














    Dr. David Filip

    ===========


    OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair


    OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer


    Spokes Research Fellow


    ADAPT Centre


    KDEG, Trinity College Dublin


    Mobile: +420-777-218-122


     










     

    On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch > wrote:



    Dear David, all,
     
    Thank you very much for your feedback. I have implemented your suggestions.
     
    https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21

     
    In the ITS section, we have now cases where there is only one attribute to be selected.
    The normal formulation for introducing that question implied several possible answers ("Please select from the following attributes the ones that your tool can process:"). Should we leave it like this for consistency or should I change the formulation of the
    question? (e.g. Can your tool process the X attribute?)
     
    One of David’s suggestions is still not modified:
     

    >>Q15 should use another example, as sdlxliff is an XLIFF 1.2 extension

    >>@Bryan, @Yves do you want to name your extended namespace examples?
     
    Please let me know if you have any more feedback.
    Best,
    Lucía
     
     
    De :
    xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ]
    De la part de David Filip
    Envoyé : mardi 21 février 2017 19:02
    À : Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch >;
    xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Objet : Re: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update


     

    Hi all,

     


    continued feedback to the questionnaire


     


    Q25.


     


    Change Tracking Module 2.1 [Change Tracking Module 2.0 was deprecated]


     


    Q58.


     


    shouldn't use radio buttons as multiple selections desirable, should use checkbox(es)


     


    But id, type, and translate are all from core (xlf) so shouldn't be re-asked here.


    The only new attribute specific for the ITS Tools Annotation is  its:annotatorsRef


    So in the end it should be just one checkbox for that attribute


     


    Q60


    same as Q58


    Should have just one checkbox for its:allowedCharacters


     



    Q62


    same as Q58 and Q60


    Should have just one checkbox for itsm:domains



     


    Q64


    shouldn't use radio buttons as multiple selections desirable, should use checkbox(es)


    Just two checkboxes:


    its: localeFilterList


    its:localeFilterType


     


    Q66


    Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core


     


     



    Q68


    Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core



     


    Q69


    Analyis -> Analysis


     




    Q70


    Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core




     


     


    Q71-Q73 should be removed


     


    Maybe replace with


     


    Q71


    Can your tool roundtrip ITS Localization Note data using XLIFF Core Note and XLIFF Core Comment
    Annotation


     


     


    Q74



    Does your tool support the Terminology data category?


    should be
    Does your tool FULLY support the Terminology data category?

     


    Q75


     


    There should be checkboxes just for the its: attributes


    + there also needs to be a checkox for 


    type="its:term-no"


    [not just for the core type unspecified]


     


    Q77


    Just one checkbox for 


    itsm:lang


     


    Q79


    Checkboxes just for the its: attributes


     


    Q81


    Checkboxes just for the its: attributes


     


     


    This is now my complete feedback


     


    When all fixed, the SOU questionnaire will be ready to
    launch


     


    Cheers dF


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     



     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     














    Dr. David Filip

    ===========


    OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair


    OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer


    Spokes Research Fellow


    ADAPT Centre


    KDEG, Trinity College Dublin


    Mobile:
    +420-777-218-122


     










     

    On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:01 PM, David Filip < david.filip@adaptcentre.ie > wrote:


    Lucía, all,

     


    finally finding some time to review this


     


     


    Links in Q1


    should be changed to cs01 links


    E.g. 


    Date TBD by now



    http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/cs01/xliff-core-v2.1-cs01.html


     


    The latest link should be


    http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/xliff-core-v2.1.html


     


     


     



    3 .   Are
    you an OASIS member?


     


    should be


     


     



    3 .   Are
    you an OASIS member or an employee of an OASIS member organization?

     


    Q4


    second line should be


    I
    am an Individual member or an associated member

    Chet clarified that asscociated
    members are not considered pripreps. For both Individual and Associated members it is sufficient to receive the statement from them individually


     


     



    11 .   Contact
    Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers, not for publication)

    should be



    11 .   Contact
    Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers IF NECESSARY, not for publication)

     


    Q15 should use another example,
    as sdlxliff is an XLIFF 1.2 extension


    @Bryan, @Yves do you want to name
    your extended namespace examples?


     


    More comments will follow tomorrow


     


    Cheers


    dF


     


     
















    Dr. David Filip

    ===========


    OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair


    OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer


    Spokes Research Fellow


    ADAPT Centre


    KDEG, Trinity College Dublin


    Mobile:
    +420-777-218-122


     












     

    On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch > wrote:



    Dear all,
     
    Following the suggestions given during yesterday’s meeting, I have included the questions on the ITS module to the SOU questionnaire:
    https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21
    Please let me know if you have any further suggestions/feedback on the questionnaire.
     
    Best,
     
    Lucia
     
     


    De :
    xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ]
    De la part de Lucia Morado Vazquez
    Envoyé : mardi 20 décembre 2016 16:31
    À : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Objet : [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft


     
    Dear all,
     
    Here is the link to the new questionnaire (draft) to collect the SOU of the new version.

    https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21
    I have modified the one we used for 2.0 to adapt it to the new spec.
    On the first page, there are two elements in red that need to be updated.

    For the ITS module, I could not think of an effective and simple way of adding additional questions to gather more information than the general support of the
    module, if you can think of any method to do it (without overcomplicating the questionnaire) please let me know.
    Let me know if you have any suggestion/remark on the questionnaire itself.
     
    Best,
    Lucía
     
     
     




     





     







     







  • 9.  Re: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update

    Posted 04-07-2017 10:26
    Hi Lucía, all, on the intro page, the link to test suite should be revision independent, it currently links to an old revision q15, we still need some examples of XLIFF 2 extensions, sdlxliff is for XLIFF 1.2 q69 may some more explanation that partial support is through core term annotation, full through the module Dr. David Filip =========== OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer Spokes Research Fellow ADAPT Centre KDEG, Trinity College Dublin Mobile: +420-777-218-122 On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch > wrote: Dear all,   As discussed in the last TC meeting, I have just applied the changes related to the new draft in the survey. https://www.surveymonkey.com/ r/souxliff21 Please let me know if you have any further feedback on it.   Thanks and have a nice weekend,   Luc ía   De : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto: xliff@lists.oasis- open.org ] De la part de Lucia Morado Vazquez Envoyé : lundi, 27 février 2017 18:24 À : David Filip < david.filip@adaptcentre.ie > Cc : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Objet : RE: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update   Dear David,   Thank you for your message. I have just changed the settings of the survey . The survey can be taken more than once from the same device.   Best,   Luc ía       De : David Filip [ mailto:david.filip@ adaptcentre.ie ] Envoyé : lundi 27 février 2017 10:08 À : Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch > Cc : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Objet : Re: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update   Hi Lucía,   it doesn't let me retake the survey.. strange not sure how it even knows? Dr. David Filip =========== OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer Spokes Research Fellow ADAPT Centre KDEG, Trinity College Dublin Mobile: +420-777-218-122     On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch > wrote: Dear David, all,   Thank you very much for your feedback. I have implemented your suggestions.   https://www.surveymonkey.com/ r/souxliff21   In the ITS section, we have now cases where there is only one attribute to be selected. The normal formulation for introducing that question implied several possible answers ("Please select from the following attributes the ones that your tool can process:"). Should we leave it like this for consistency or should I change the formulation of the question? (e.g. Can your tool process the X attribute?)   One of David’s suggestions is still not modified:   >>Q15 should use another example, as sdlxliff is an XLIFF 1.2 extension >>@Bryan, @Yves do you want to name your extended namespace examples?   Please let me know if you have any more feedback. Best, Lucía     De : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto: xliff@lists.oasis- open.org ] De la part de David Filip Envoyé : mardi 21 février 2017 19:02 À : Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch >; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Objet : Re: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update   Hi all,   continued feedback to the questionnaire   Q25.   Change Tracking Module 2.1 [Change Tracking Module 2.0 was deprecated]   Q58.   shouldn't use radio buttons as multiple selections desirable, should use checkbox(es)   But id, type, and translate are all from core (xlf) so shouldn't be re-asked here. The only new attribute specific for the ITS Tools Annotation is  its:annotatorsRef So in the end it should be just one checkbox for that attribute   Q60 same as Q58 Should have just one checkbox for its:allowedCharacters   Q62 same as Q58 and Q60 Should have just one checkbox for itsm:domains   Q64 shouldn't use radio buttons as multiple selections desirable, should use checkbox(es) Just two checkboxes: its: localeFilterList its:localeFilterType   Q66 Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core     Q68 Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core   Q69 Analyis -> Analysis   Q70 Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core     Q71-Q73 should be removed   Maybe replace with   Q71 Can your tool roundtrip ITS Localization Note data using XLIFF Core Note and XLIFF Core Comment Annotation     Q74 Does your tool support the Terminology data category? should be Does your tool FULLY support the Terminology data category?   Q75   There should be checkboxes just for the its: attributes + there also needs to be a checkox for  type="its:term-no" [not just for the core type unspecified]   Q77 Just one checkbox for  itsm:lang   Q79 Checkboxes just for the its: attributes   Q81 Checkboxes just for the its: attributes     This is now my complete feedback   When all fixed, the SOU questionnaire will be ready to launch   Cheers dF                                                           Dr. David Filip =========== OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer Spokes Research Fellow ADAPT Centre KDEG, Trinity College Dublin Mobile: +420-777-218-122     On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:01 PM, David Filip < david.filip@adaptcentre.ie > wrote: Lucía, all,   finally finding some time to review this     Links in Q1 should be changed to cs01 links E.g.  Date TBD by now http://docs.oasis-open.org/ xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/cs01/ xliff-core-v2.1-cs01.html   The latest link should be http://docs.oasis-open.org/ xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/xliff- core-v2.1.html       3 .   Are you an OASIS member?   should be     3 .   Are you an OASIS member or an employee of an OASIS member organization?   Q4 second line should be I am an Individual member or an associated member Chet clarified that asscociated members are not considered pripreps. For both Individual and Associated members it is sufficient to receive the statement from them individually     11 .   Contact Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers, not for publication) should be 11 .   Contact Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers IF NECESSARY, not for publication)   Q15 should use another example, as sdlxliff is an XLIFF 1.2 extension @Bryan, @Yves do you want to name your extended namespace examples?   More comments will follow tomorrow   Cheers dF     Dr. David Filip =========== OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer Spokes Research Fellow ADAPT Centre KDEG, Trinity College Dublin Mobile: +420-777-218-122     On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch > wrote: Dear all,   Following the suggestions given during yesterday’s meeting, I have included the questions on the ITS module to the SOU questionnaire: https://www.surveymonkey.com/ r/souxliff21 Please let me know if you have any further suggestions/feedback on the questionnaire.   Best,   Lucia     De : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto: xliff@lists.oasis- open.org ] De la part de Lucia Morado Vazquez Envoyé : mardi 20 décembre 2016 16:31 À : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Objet : [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft   Dear all,   Here is the link to the new questionnaire (draft) to collect the SOU of the new version. https://www.surveymonkey.com/ r/souxliff21 I have modified the one we used for 2.0 to adapt it to the new spec. On the first page, there are two elements in red that need to be updated. For the ITS module, I could not think of an effective and simple way of adding additional questions to gather more information than the general support of the module, if you can think of any method to do it (without overcomplicating the questionnaire) please let me know. Let me know if you have any suggestion/remark on the questionnaire itself.   Best, Lucía            


  • 10.  RE: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update

    Posted 04-11-2017 18:35




    Dear David, all,
     
    Thank you very much for your feedback.
     
    >>on the intro page, the link to test suite should be revision independent, it currently links to an old revision
    The URL has been modified.
     
    >>q15, we still need some examples of XLIFF 2 extensions, sdlxliff is for XLIFF 1.2
    In the meantime (or in the case we will not get examples), the note has been modified as follows:  
    Does your tool produce its own custom XLIFF extensions? ( such
    as, for example, "sdlxliff" for the version XLIFF 1.2 )
     
    >>q69 may some more explanation that partial support is through core term annotation, full through the module
    A note has been added to clarify this question.
     
    Best,
    Lucía
     
     
    De : David Filip [mailto:david.filip@adaptcentre.ie]

    Envoyé : vendredi, 7 avril 2017 12:25
    À : Lucia Morado Vazquez <Lucia.Morado@unige.ch>
    Cc : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Objet : Re: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update
     

    Hi Lucía, all,

     


    on the intro page, the link to test suite should be revision independent, it currently links to an old revision


     


    q15, we still need some examples of XLIFF 2 extensions, sdlxliff is for XLIFF 1.2


     


    q69 may some more explanation that partial support is through core term annotation, full through the module














    Dr. David Filip

    ===========


    OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair


    OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer


    Spokes Research Fellow


    ADAPT Centre


    KDEG, Trinity College Dublin


    Mobile: +420-777-218-122


     










     

    On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch > wrote:



    Dear all,
     
    As discussed in the last TC meeting, I have just applied the changes related to the new
    draft in the survey.
    https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21

    Please let me know if you have any further feedback on it.
     
    Thanks and have a nice weekend,
     
    Luc ía
     


    De :
    xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ]
    De la part de Lucia Morado Vazquez
    Envoyé : lundi, 27 février 2017 18:24
    À : David Filip < david.filip@adaptcentre.ie >
    Cc : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Objet : RE: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update


     
    Dear David,
     
    Thank you for your message. I have just changed the settings of the survey . The survey
    can be taken more than once from the same device.


     
    Best,
     
    Luc ía
     
     
     
    De : David Filip
    [ mailto:david.filip@adaptcentre.ie ]

    Envoyé : lundi 27 février 2017 10:08
    À : Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch >
    Cc : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Objet : Re: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update
     

    Hi Lucía,

     


    it doesn't let me retake the survey.. strange not sure how it even knows?














    Dr. David Filip

    ===========


    OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair


    OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer


    Spokes Research Fellow


    ADAPT Centre


    KDEG, Trinity College Dublin


    Mobile:
    +420-777-218-122


     










     

    On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch > wrote:



    Dear David, all,
     
    Thank you very much for your feedback. I have implemented your suggestions.
     
    https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21

     
    In the ITS section, we have now cases where there is only one attribute to be selected.
    The normal formulation for introducing that question implied several possible answers ("Please select from the following attributes the ones that your tool can process:"). Should we leave it like this for consistency or should I change the formulation of the
    question? (e.g. Can your tool process the X attribute?)
     
    One of David’s suggestions is still not modified:
     

    >>Q15 should use another example, as sdlxliff is an XLIFF 1.2 extension

    >>@Bryan, @Yves do you want to name your extended namespace examples?
     
    Please let me know if you have any more feedback.
    Best,
    Lucía
     
     
    De :
    xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ]
    De la part de David Filip
    Envoyé : mardi 21 février 2017 19:02
    À : Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch >;
    xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Objet : Re: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update


     

    Hi all,

     


    continued feedback to the questionnaire


     


    Q25.


     


    Change Tracking Module 2.1 [Change Tracking Module 2.0 was deprecated]


     


    Q58.


     


    shouldn't use radio buttons as multiple selections desirable, should use checkbox(es)


     


    But id, type, and translate are all from core (xlf) so shouldn't be re-asked here.


    The only new attribute specific for the ITS Tools Annotation is  its:annotatorsRef


    So in the end it should be just one checkbox for that attribute


     


    Q60


    same as Q58


    Should have just one checkbox for its:allowedCharacters


     



    Q62


    same as Q58 and Q60


    Should have just one checkbox for itsm:domains



     


    Q64


    shouldn't use radio buttons as multiple selections desirable, should use checkbox(es)


    Just two checkboxes:


    its: localeFilterList


    its:localeFilterType


     


    Q66


    Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core


     


     



    Q68


    Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core



     


    Q69


    Analyis -> Analysis


     




    Q70


    Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core




     


     


    Q71-Q73 should be removed


     


    Maybe replace with


     


    Q71


    Can your tool roundtrip ITS Localization Note data using XLIFF Core Note and XLIFF Core Comment
    Annotation


     


     


    Q74



    Does your tool support the Terminology data category?


    should be
    Does your tool FULLY support the Terminology data category?

     


    Q75


     


    There should be checkboxes just for
    the its: attributes


    + there also needs to be a checkox
    for 


    type="its:term-no"


    [not just for the core type unspecified]


     


    Q77


    Just one checkbox for 


    itsm:lang


     


    Q79


    Checkboxes just for the its: attributes


     


    Q81


    Checkboxes just for the its: attributes


     


     


    This is now my complete feedback


     


    When all fixed, the SOU questionnaire
    will be ready to launch


     


    Cheers dF


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     



     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     














    Dr. David Filip

    ===========


    OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair


    OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer


    Spokes Research Fellow


    ADAPT Centre


    KDEG, Trinity College Dublin


    Mobile:
    +420-777-218-122


     










     

    On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:01 PM, David Filip < david.filip@adaptcentre.ie > wrote:


    Lucía, all,

     


    finally finding some time to review this


     


     


    Links in Q1


    should be changed to cs01 links


    E.g. 


    Date TBD by now



    http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/cs01/xliff-core-v2.1-cs01.html


     


    The latest link
    should be


    http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/xliff-core-v2.1.html


     


     


     



    3 .   Are
    you an OASIS member?


     


    should be


     


     



    3 .   Are
    you an OASIS member or an employee of an OASIS member organization?

     


    Q4


    second line
    should be


    I
    am an Individual member or an associated member

    Chet clarified
    that asscociated members are not considered pripreps. For both Individual and Associated members it is sufficient to receive the statement from them individually


     


     



    11 .   Contact
    Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers, not for publication)

    should be



    11 .   Contact
    Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers IF NECESSARY, not for publication)

     


    Q15 should use
    another example, as sdlxliff is an XLIFF 1.2 extension


    @Bryan, @Yves
    do you want to name your extended namespace examples?


     


    More comments
    will follow tomorrow


     


    Cheers


    dF


     


     
















    Dr. David Filip

    ===========


    OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair


    OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer


    Spokes Research Fellow


    ADAPT Centre


    KDEG, Trinity College Dublin


    Mobile:
    +420-777-218-122


     












     

    On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Lucia Morado Vazquez < Lucia.Morado@unige.ch > wrote:



    Dear all,
     
    Following the suggestions given during yesterday’s meeting, I have included the questions on the ITS module to the SOU questionnaire:
    https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21
    Please let me know if you have any further suggestions/feedback on the questionnaire.
     
    Best,
     
    Lucia
     
     


    De :
    xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ]
    De la part de Lucia Morado Vazquez
    Envoyé : mardi 20 décembre 2016 16:31
    À : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Objet : [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft


     
    Dear all,
     
    Here is the link to the new questionnaire (draft) to collect the SOU of the new version.

    https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21
    I have modified the one we used for 2.0 to adapt it to the new spec.
    On the first page, there are two elements in red that need to be updated.

    For the ITS module, I could not think of an effective and simple way of adding additional questions to gather more information than the general support of the
    module, if you can think of any method to do it (without overcomplicating the questionnaire) please let me know.
    Let me know if you have any suggestion/remark on the questionnaire itself.
     
    Best,
    Lucía