We already voted NOT to do this kind of editorial round again. Excerpt from Conference Call 1-22-02 Motion: Following the validation of the specifications, if any clarifications to the specification are required, we will ballot that specification for consideration for submission prior to submitting to OASIS. ? Bob, second: David F. Question: What do we mean by freezing technical changes? (Doug) Changing PositiveInteger to nonNegativeInteger is correcting an inconsistency not a technical change. Friendly Amendment: Voting would be to consider any errata from items received or implementation experience before it is submitted to the OASIS membership. These will be voted on as a new TC specification. ? Chris . Bob did not accept. Comment: We need a Change Control Officer for the next 6 weeks ? Ian. (Doug agree). Ian ? any objections (no) motion passes. Most of the items marked as Disagree are to comply with the vote cited above. These items are not *correcting an inconsistency* nor *required clarifications*. We can deal with this kind of thing in v3.0. I would like to withdraw my submission titled ebMS_v2_0revA.pdf. Ian, please do not post to the web site. Regards, David Fischer Drummond Group.