i think "1.x" will continue to have the same level of confusion regardless of the numeration construct. how about: "XACML v1.0, Specification Candidate 1 (2,3,4)" or "XACML v1.0, Editorial Version 1 (2,3,4)" this way the spec 'version' never changes, just the editorial numbering (which will be discarded once submitted and approved). b Carlisle Adams wrote: > Hi all, > > On today's call we decided to change the number of the new Committee > Spec. to 1.1 (since the version we approved prior to the start of the > comment period was 1.0). However, in several places in the spec we > refer to "XACML v1.0", and all of our names (URIs) have "1.0" in them. > Ultimately, if we get to OASIS Standard, I assume that standard will be > numbered 1.0. This all seems potentially confusing. > > Would it be any better to call this Committee Specification version > 1.01, or 1.0a, or 1.0.1? Any other suggestions or comments? > > Please respond as soon as possible; I'd like to get the final version > out today. > > Carlisle. >