MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















emergency message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [emergency] RE: Question on EDXL-DE schema




From: "Ellis, David" <dellis@sandia.gov>
To: "Aymond, Patti" <Patti.Aymond@iem.com>,"Mark Carlson - Conneva, Inc." <conneva@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:21:26 -0700














Patti /Mark

 

Did we specify “any##” in the current
documentation?  The schema values should be ##any and every place I have looked
it is correct.  Was there an typographical error in version 7 of the schema?

 



David E. Ellis

Information Management Architect

(505) 844-6697



 









From: Aymond, Patti
[mailto:Patti.Aymond@iem.com]

Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006
9:18 AM

To: Mark Carlson - Conneva, Inc.

Cc: Emergency_Mgt_TC TC

Subject: [emergency] RE: Question
on EDXL-DE schema



 

Mark,

 

I am no schema expert, but I did not have
any problems getting the EDXL-DE to validate in tools that I have (XML Spy is
not one of them). Maybe someone on the TC can offer some suggestions for you.

 

Welcome to the TC.

 

Patti 

 



Patti Iles Aymond, PhD

Senior
Scientist

Bioterrorism
Preparedness & Response 

Innovative Emergency Management, Inc.

Managing Risk in a Complex World

8555 United Plaza
Blvd.   Suite 100

Baton
Rouge, LA 70809

(225)
952-8228 (phone)

(225)
952-8122 (fax) 











From: Mark Carlson -
Conneva, Inc. [mailto:conneva@gmail.com]

Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006
10:34 AM

To: Aymond, Patti

Subject: Question on EDXL-DE
schema



 



Patti,





 





I'm a new TC member and am taking my first look at the various
documents and schemas.  When I open version 7 of the EDXL-DE schema in XML
Spy, I receive an error stating that





 







The content model contains the elements <element
name="nonXMLContent"> and <any namespace="any##">
which can not be uniquely determined.







 





When I remove the "<any namespace="any##"> or
change it to <any
namespace="local##"> the schema validates
successfully.  





 





I understand that this change was introduced recently to support XML
signatures.  Do I have something setup incorrectly in XML Spy or is there
something else we need to do to the schema to make it valid.





 





Mark Carlson





Conneva, Inc.





 





 








IEM CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION PLEASE READ OUR NOTICE:
http://www.ieminc.com/e_mail_confidentiality_notice.html













[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]