UBL Naming and Design Rules SC

RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Bill&Eve's proposal on local/global elements

  • 1.  RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Bill&Eve's proposal on local/global elements

    Posted 01-31-2002 11:50
     MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    ubl-ndrsc message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


    Subject: RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Bill&Eve's proposal on local/global elements


    Title: RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Bill&Eve's proposal on local/global elements

    Mike R. wrote - 
    > >If we want to maintain ebXML/CEFACT CC compliance, then I
    > would hesitate
    > >to add new
    > >RTs.

    Eve responded - 
    > We probably won't be able to get away without adding at least
    > a few, as I
    > understand it.  First, we might need syntax-binding-specific
    > representation
    > terms such as one relating to XML mixed content.  Second,
    > since the CC spec
    > hasn't really been tried out yet with a real syntax and is
    > still in draft
    > form (right?), we may run across things they didn't think of.
    >  In any case,
    > we're committed to feeding back our experience in the hope
    > that appropriate
    > new RTs will get adopted by the CC side.


    I am keeping my mind open on adding RTs.  The initial list was created without any run time analysis.  There are already requests into CEFACT to add CCts and RTs.

    Mark



    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


    Powered by eList eXpress LLC