MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
office message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Proposed change to Monday's agenda (IRI's versus URI's)
So we're all on the same page, appended
is the text of the latest details on the issue I've received. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Technical comments from the Japanese
National Body: 1) Use IRI (Internationalized Resource
Identifiers: RFC 3987) instead of URI (Uniform Resource Identifiers: RFC
2396) to allow file names to be specified in languages worldwide including
Japanese, Chinese, and Korean while URI allows only English (US-ASCII)2) Do not refer to W3C CSS3 text module
and W3C DOM level 3 events; define necessary portions in ODF “W3C CSS3 text module” and “W3C DOM
level 3 events” are incomplete and may require major amendments or even
abolishedPositions of Japan National Body: 1) The comment on IRI (No. 1 above)
will be the condition to approve DIS 263002) Other comments (including No. 2 above)
will or will not be conditions to approve DIS 26300. This will be discussed
in the next Japanese National Body meeting Implications:1) Both DIS 26300 and OASIS ODF v1.0
should be amended2) Negotiation with OASIS ODF members
is required ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------It will help if the TC can vote a motion
to acknowledge the issues and recommend the technical resolution of them.
The following draft motion is one possible form for expressing this:"In response to feedback from the
Japanese National Body, the OASIS OpenDocument for Office Applications
Technical Committee agree to the following:1) resolution to IRI issue2) resolution to CSS3 issue3) resolution to DOM level 3 events
issueThese changes will be made to ISO/IEC
DIS 26300, as well as OASIS OpenDocument for Office Applications 1.0 according
to existing OASIS and ISO procedures."---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I'm hoping we can agree to wording along
the lines of the above, and get that recorded into the meeting minutes.
Note that we don't need to have page and line-level text changes
at this point. That will obviously require more time and editing,
review, etc. But we need to be able to describe our technical
approach in sufficient detail that it will be clear to the reader that
our changes will in fact address the stated issues.Regards,-Rob
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]