OASIS Digital Signature Services eXtended (DSS-X) TC

  • 1.  DSS-X: next meeting issues

    Posted 10-21-2008 10:50
    Dear Clemens,
    
    Next conf call is the first of the two ones devoted to the encryption 
    profile. I think that it would be helpful to think in advance on the 
    issues that you would like to be discussed (and eventually agreed if 
    required) on this profile so that at the meeting we could see effective 
    progress...Could you please let us know how do you think that we could 
    get the maximum benefit of the next call, ie, maybe by enumerating the 
    issues that you would like to be discussed in the next conf call, or any 
    other suggestion that you may have?
    
    Thank you very much
    
    Regards
    
    Juan Carlos.
    


  • 2.  Re: DSS-X: next meeting issues

    Posted 10-21-2008 19:06
    
    

    Juan Carlos, Detlef, all,

    The remaining encryption profile work items are listed below.

    EncryptionProfile I

    1. finalize encrypt schema: see updated issues in http://wiki.oasis-open.org/dss-x/Encryption_profile

    2. decrypt schema (not yet started)

    - How to specify what parts of input to decrypt?

    - How to integrate decryption with verification (see xmlenc-decrypt)? Specify DecryptRequest/Response only?

    3. en/decryption processing (not yet started, probably the most difficult section, kick-off after decrypt schema finished)

    I will try to finalize the schema (1. and 2.), so that we can focus on remaining issues (most probably how to integrate EncryptedDocument with the existing dss:DocumentBaseType) and on the processing section. I am not an expert in DSS processing, probably we could sketch the changes to the basic processing during the call? In this case, please revise the DSS (basic) processing for the next call! Please also have a look at http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dss-x/download.php/28617/encryption_profile_0.4.xsd

    EncryptionProfile II

    1. start/finalize processing section

    2. impact on other profiles?

    EncryptionProfile III

    1. finalize draft profile document for balloting

    Am Dienstag, 21. Oktober 2008 schrieb Juan Carlos Cruellas:

    > Dear Clemens,

    >

    > Next conf call is the first of the two ones devoted to the encryption

    > profile. I think that it would be helpful to think in advance on the

    > issues that you would like to be discussed (and eventually agreed if

    > required) on this profile so that at the meeting we could see effective

    > progress...Could you please let us know how do you think that we could

    > get the maximum benefit of the next call, ie, maybe by enumerating the

    > issues that you would like to be discussed in the next conf call, or any

    > other suggestion that you may have?

    >

    > Thank you very much

    >

    > Regards

    >

    > Juan Carlos.



  • 3.  Re: DSS-X: next meeting issues

    Posted 10-23-2008 10:54
    Dear all,
    
    Following Clemens' message, we have started to produce the agenda for 
    next meeting, which will be distributed as soon as possible.
    
    May I also ask you, specially to those that were identified as reviewers 
    of this profile, to read the workd done by Clemens and if possible to 
    start discussions by email or at least at the next meeting?
    
    Regards
    
    Juan Carlos.
    Clemens Orthacker escribió:
    >
    > Juan Carlos, Detlef, all,
    >
    > The remaining encryption profile work items are listed below.
    >
    > EncryptionProfile I
    >
    > 1. finalize encrypt schema: see updated issues in 
    > http://wiki.oasis-open.org/dss-x/Encryption_profile
    >
    > 2. decrypt schema (not yet started)
    >
    > - How to specify what parts of input to decrypt?
    >
    > - How to integrate decryption with verification (see xmlenc-decrypt)? 
    > Specify DecryptRequest/Response only?
    >
    > 3. en/decryption processing (not yet started, probably the most 
    > difficult section, kick-off after decrypt schema finished)
    >
    > I will try to finalize the schema (1. and 2.), so that we can focus on 
    > remaining issues (most probably how to integrate EncryptedDocument 
    > with the existing dss:DocumentBaseType) and on the processing section. 
    > I am not an expert in DSS processing, probably we could sketch the 
    > changes to the basic processing during the call? In this case, please 
    > revise the DSS (basic) processing for the next call! Please also have 
    > a look at 
    > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dss-x/download.php/28617/encryption_profile_0.4.xsd
    >
    > EncryptionProfile II
    >
    > 1. start/finalize processing section
    >
    > 2. impact on other profiles?
    >
    > EncryptionProfile III
    >
    > 1. finalize draft profile document for balloting
    >
    > Am Dienstag, 21. Oktober 2008 schrieb Juan Carlos Cruellas:
    >
    > > Dear Clemens,
    >
    > >
    >
    > > Next conf call is the first of the two ones devoted to the encryption
    >
    > > profile. I think that it would be helpful to think in advance on the
    >
    > > issues that you would like to be discussed (and eventually agreed if
    >
    > > required) on this profile so that at the meeting we could see effective
    >
    > > progress...Could you please let us know how do you think that we could
    >
    > > get the maximum benefit of the next call, ie, maybe by enumerating the
    >
    > > issues that you would like to be discussed in the next conf call, or any
    >
    > > other suggestion that you may have?
    >
    > >
    >
    > > Thank you very much
    >
    > >
    >
    > > Regards
    >
    > >
    >
    > > Juan Carlos.
    >
    
    


  • 4.  XMLEnc: some reactions to issues by Clemens

    Posted 10-23-2008 15:44
    Clemens,
     
    I have read again the contents of the wiki....please find below  
    intermixed my first reactions to some of your issues:
    
    1. You mention: "EncryptedDocument inheritance? Find a way to include it 
    as DocumentWithSignature document child"
    
    This happens when you encrypt and generate an enveloped signature. My 
    question is, why the tag 


  • 5.  Re: XMLEnc: some reactions to issues by Clemens

    Posted 10-24-2008 17:10
    Juan Carlos, all,
    
    Thanks for the input.
    
    Am Donnerstag, 23. Oktober 2008 17:47 schrieben Sie:
    > 1. You mention: "EncryptedDocument inheritance? Find a way to include it
    > as DocumentWithSignature document child"
    >
    > This happens when you encrypt and generate an enveloped signature. My
    > question is, why the tag