Greetings! Great meeting today! Notes follow below. Hope everyone is having a great week! Patrick PS: Thanks to Svante for helping move us along on the SVG question! Sometimes I worry issues too long! ****************** Patrick: quorum yes! Patrick: Agenda - changes or additions - Svante finished editorial work - take it up next week Patrick: approved by consent Patrick: approve minutes of November 16th - by consent Patrick: Kelly Loeffler Normative constraint in non-normative Appendix
https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4086 Regina has clarified my resolution:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/office/email/archives/202011/msg00068.html (much improved, let's accept it) Patrick: Regina's changes accepted and approved. Patrick: Default values on dots1 and dots2 -
https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4098 Regina has posted a resolution:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/office/email/archives/202011/msg00070.html Patrick: Default values on dots1 and dots2 -
https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4098 Regina has posted a resolution:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/office/email/archives/202011/msg00070.html Francis: I'm here, but the phone system isn't accepting my access code. I'll try another phone... Patrick: Thanks Francis! Patrick: Office-4098 - Regina's proposal accepted by consent Patrick: Kelly Loeffler"system table" or system-table in db:attribute (19.85.4 db:table-definition) part 3)
https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4029 Regina comments:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/office/email/archives/202011/msg00039.html use "system-table" Patrick: Francis suggest searching attribute styles with a space in the string Patrick: Svante looked at the schema - but not the other two grammars or the specification - postpone - Patrick: Kelly LoefflerAllow native SVG instead of <office:binary-data> for images
https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-3995 Patrick:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/office/email/archives/202011/msg00082.html Patrick: The fragment is a Conforming SVG Document Fragment ... Patrick: as described in [SVG]
https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/conform.html section G.2, or equivalent conformance clauses in other SVG Recommendations as published by W3C that use the same W3Csvg XML namespace. as described in [SVG]
https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/conform.html section G.2, or equivalent conformance clauses in other SVG Recommendations as published by W3C that use the same W3Csvg XML namespace. Patrick: as described in [SVG]
https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/conform.html section G.2, or equivalent conformance clauses in other SVG Recommendations as published by W3C that use the same W3Csvg XML namespace. This is a Conforming SVG Document Fragment as described in [SVG]
https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/conform.html section G.2, or equivalent conformance clauses in other SVG Recommendations as published by W3C that use the same W3Csvg XML namespace. Patrick: Andreas - SVG can change and a consumer may no longer conform. Patrick: Michael - can ignore element if not understood - not a new problem Patrick: Andreas - doesn't have the version attached to it, in a fragment - Patrick: as described in [SVG]
https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/conform.html section G.2, or equivalent conformance clauses in other SVG Recommendations as published by W3C that use the same W3Csvg XML namespace.
https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/struct.html#SVGElementVersionAttribute Patrick: Michael - fixed keyword for SVG 1.1 - DTD - has the value in the DTD - for a fragment - don't have DTD - main difference is that the fragment can't contain a doctype declaration - anonymous morphed into Svante Schubert Michael Stahl:
https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/svgdtd.html - version %Number.datatype; #FIXED '1.1' Patrick: Michael - if later versions are strict super-sets of older work, not a problem Patrick: Michael - but SVGTiny is a subset of the prior work Patrick: Michael - could require version attribute on our SVG element Patrick: Regina - that's difficult - producer would need to look into it - prefers to put SVG in package into this element without looking into it Patrick: Michael - could recommend that version attribute be present, with should instead of shall Patrick: Patrick - or we could allow consumers to fail when they don't understand the format. Ugly but practical Patrick: Svante - need to postpone - need to think about it. - discuss on email - Patrick: as described in [SVG]
https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/conform.html section G.2, or equivalent conformance clauses in other SVG Recommendations as published by W3C that use the same W3Csvg XML namespace. Compare all paytypes in ODF 1.3 for consistency
https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-3915 Patrick: Number PayType ] ] )Number PayType ] ] ) Patrick: With PayType = 1 the first payment is made on the same day the loan is taken out. Patrick: Clarification for the user - notice that payment is due on the first day of the period - more of a note (Regina) Patrick: so, "With PayType = 1 the first payment is made on the same day the loan is taken out." is more of a note. - Perhaps we should consider changing it to a note. Patrick: Francis + I will check on making it a note. - Francis asks about the "loan" terminology Patrick: Custom display names in data pilot tables
https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-3884 Patrick: New owner? Patrick: Regina - as user you want to give the row summary and column summary a name - but the proposal does not cover this - and not currently possible. - Patrick: Office-3884 needs to be changed to be really user friendly Patrick: Patrick - try to produce a better proposal by Jan. 2021. Patrick: Adjournment -- Patrick Durusau
patrick@durusau.net Technical Advisory Board, OASIS (TAB) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps) Another Word For It (blog):
http://tm.durusau.net Homepage:
http://www.durusau.net Twitter: patrickDurusau