OASIS ebXML Messaging Services TC

Back to discussions
Expand all | Collapse all

Re: [ebxml-cppa] Re: [ebxml-msg] Proposed CPP/A schema changes to dealwith ebMS permessage parameters

  • 1.  Re: [ebxml-cppa] Re: [ebxml-msg] Proposed CPP/A schema changes to dealwith ebMS permessage parameters

    Posted 11-27-2001 09:20 
    
Arvola,

I am having trouble understanding your suggestion.  If the two parties
agree on "per message", there is no default.  Whatever is in the message
header for a message controls.  If they agree on "yes" or on "no", that
agreement is the default and applies to all messages.  The only other kind
of default would be a default given in the schema for the case where
AckRequested is missing from the CPA.  We certainly don't want to encourage
side agreements that contradict the CPA or the schema.

Regards,
Marty

*************************************************************************************

Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
*************************************************************************************



Arvola Chan <arvola@tibco.com> on 11/26/2001 04:23:53 PM

To:    "PEDRETTIBRUCE (HP-NewJerseyex2)" <bruce_pedretti@hp.com>,
       ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org, ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org
cc:
Subject:    [ebxml-cppa] Re: [ebxml-msg] Proposed CPP/A schema changes to
       deal with ebMS permessage parameters




Bruce:

I was allowing for the fact that the two parties may have  agreed that a
property like AckRequested is "perMessage" and still specify in  the CPA a
bilaterally agreed default value (which can be different�from the  schema
default) for the property should the sending application omit to specify  a
value for this property.

If such negotiated defaults are unnecessary, then I agree that  your
suggested simplifications will be sufficient.

Thanks,
-Arvola


Related Content