MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
office message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Important question from Accessibility SC
Good question. I'd be inclined to either create a new attribute or use
svg:desc. I wouldn't like using draw:name or office:name. That seems
like a misuse of those tags.
How about two new tags: 'office:desc' and 'office:long-desc'? This idea
is inspired by:
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-HTML-TECHS/#image-text-equivalent
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-HTML-TECHS/#long-descriptions
Cheers,
Daniel.
Nathaniel S Borenstein wrote:
>
> The accessibility committee has a question that it wishes to pose to the
> full TC.
>
> There are several places where ODF currently lacks a way to specify an
> alternative textual description of a non-textual object. In such cases,
> we could either invent a new tag or reuse an existing tag in what seems
> (to us) to be a reasonable way. In particular, we're wondering whether
> or not we can simply use draw:name, svg:desc, and office:name for such a
> purpose. Would the TC recommend doing so, or would it be preferable for
> us to create a new tag such as svg:title? Obviously either approach
> will work, but we aren't sure which is better. All opinions are
> invited. -- Nathaniel
--
/\/`) http://opendocumentfellowship.org
/\/_/
/\/_/ A life? Sounds great!
\/_/ Do you know where I could download one?
/
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]