MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
office message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: UK Comment 7
Patrick, all,
I have replaced all occurencies of "unicode" and "UNICODE" with a
bibliographic reference to [UNICODE], that is defined as follows (see
page 697):
[UNICODE] The Unicode Consortium. The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0.0,
defined by: The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0 (Boston, MA,
Addison-Wesley, 2003. ISBN 0-321-18578-1)
Please note that this is a reference to the latest major version of
UNICODE (4.0). The XML 1.0 specification itself references UNICODE 3.2.
Please let me know if you consider this to be an issue.
Changes were made to the following pages:
35
84
85 (2x)
86 (2x)
519
549
557
558 (2x)
560
562
577
578
I have further added references to RFC2045 on some occurencies of
BASE64, and at the same time corrected the spelling of "base64" where it
appeared in lower case letters. In detail:
299:
The <draw:image> then element contains an <office:binary-data> element
that contains the image data in BASE64 encoding.
to
The <draw:image> then element contains an <office:binary-data> element
that contains the image data in BASE64 encoding (as defined in [RFC2045]).
690:
The manifest:checksum attribute specifies the base64 encoded digest that
to
The manifest:checksum attribute specifies the digest in BASE64 encoding
(as defined in [RFC2045]) that
691:
is encoded in base64 when
to
is encoded in BASE64 (as defined in [RFC2045]) when
692:
is encoded in base64 before
to
is encoded in BASE64 (as defined in [RFC2045]) before
Please not that there are some more occurencies of BASE64, but they all
describe the content of the <office:binary-data> element, so I think it
is sufficient to have the reference to RFC2045 on page 299, where this
element actually is defined.
RFC2045 is defined in the bibliography index on page 697 as follows:
[RFC2045] N. Freed and N. Borenstein, Multipurpose Internet Mail
Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies,
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2045.txt, IETF, 1996.
If you disagree to one or more of these changes, please let me know that.
Best regards
Michael
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]