MHonArc v2.5.2 -->

















wsia message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]








Subject: RE: [wsia][wsia-requirements][R602]




From: Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>
To: "Young, Brian R" <brian.r.young@boeing.com>,'Eilon Reshef' <eilon.reshef@webcollage.com>,'Sean Fitts' <sean@crossweave.com>, wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 15:07:05 -0700






Title: RE:
[wsia][wsia-requirements][R602]


I have the same concern, but I am assuming that the first
paragraph covers such languages as Perl for CGI and Python, but while
we are at it, should we consider adding an e.g. in that first
paragraph so that stipulating Javascript is understood as standing on
par with binaries as obvious? And since we are already specifying CSS
and fragments, I have a personal interest in seeing support PHP as
well ASP and JSP. This is exactly what I meant by saying that I prefer
using the MUST NOT preclude phrasing, for now, and establishing a
sample implementation and reference implementations from which to
conduct conformance testing by rev 2... or 3.


Ciao,
Rex


At 2:53 PM -0700 5/8/02, Young, Brian R wrote:
What about support for scripting languages other than
JavaScript?
 


Brian R. Young

The Boeing Company

(425) 865-5834

brian.r.young@boeing.com

DISCLAIMER: Any opinions
expressed in this e-mail are my own and do not necessarily reflect the
position of my company.