On 10/13/08 05:58, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> One suggestion, one set of questions:
>
> 1. It would appear that it is appropriate to incorporate this text into the
> current draft 7-10.
>
> 2. I am a little baffled about the default case when there is no explicit
> specification of a formatting property in the direct style and its ancestors
> (via the style:parent-style-name chain) and the default style of the
> style:family also fails to provide the formatting property.
>
> 2.1 Is this a case for which we are looking to make consistent defaults
> and that is being explored separately?
This is
http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/Add_default_values
>
> 2.2 Are there also cases where the absence of a formatting property is
> best understood as meaning that the property does not exist or does not
> apply in the case at hand?
There are different cases why a default for a property does not appear
in file:
- The property indeed may not apply.
- The author of the document does not want to provide a value, but wants
to leave it up to the application to choose an appropriate value.
- There may be no reasonable default value.
>
> 2.3 If the formatting property is needed, and there is no provision, is
> this not an error in the document? (I am trying to understand why the
> default in the absence of explicit and default specification is
> implementation-specific, and why it is a good thing in this case.)
No, this is not an error in the document.
Michael
--
Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering
StarOffice/OpenOffice.org
Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55
D-20097 Hamburg, Germany michael.brauer@sun.com
http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500
http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1,
D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering