OASIS Emergency Management TC

  • 1.  Request for CS and OS Ballot for CAP 1.2

    Posted 01-26-2010 00:16 
    Dear Mary,

The EM-TC voted on 1/19/2010 to request a ballot for Committee 
Specification for CAP 1.2.  The meeting notes indicating a vote for 
Committee Draft, a request for CS ballot and a request to begin the 
OASIS Wide Standard vote can be found at 
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/download.php/36003/Draft%20Meeting%20Notes%201-19-10.doc

The document link 
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/download.php/35821/CAPv1.2-CD04.doc 
refers to the CD04 which was voted to advance to CS and Standard in 
the meeting notes above.  We understand that there wont be any title 
changes until the CS is approved.  Once that is done, we can supply 
the html and pdf versions.

We understand that three statements of use are required for OASIS 
ratification vote.  Links to these statements are provided below:

WSI: 
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201001/msg00012.html
IEM: 
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201001/msg00027.html
MyStateUSA: 
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201001/msg00033.html

Please begin the ballot for Committee Specification for CAP 1.2 at 
your earliest convenience and the OASIS-wide Standard vote as soon as 
possible.  If there is anything additional you need, do not hesitate 
to contact me.

Elysa Jones, Chair

OASIS EM-TC
CTO Warning Systems, Inc.
256-880-8702 x102 office
256-694-8702 mobile


  • 2.  Re: [emergency] Request for CS and OS Ballot for CAP 1.2

    Posted 01-26-2010 00:51 
    Thanks Elysa,

Onward!
Rex

Elysa Jones wrote:
> Dear Mary,
>
> The EM-TC voted on 1/19/2010 to request a ballot for Committee 
> Specification for CAP 1.2.  The meeting notes indicating a vote for 
> Committee Draft, a request for CS ballot and a request to begin the 
> OASIS Wide Standard vote can be found at 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/download.php/36003/Draft%20Meeting%20Notes%201-19-10.doc 
>
>
> The document link 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/download.php/35821/CAPv1.2-CD04.doc 
> refers to the CD04 which was voted to advance to CS and Standard in 
> the meeting notes above.  We understand that there wont be any title 
> changes until the CS is approved.  Once that is done, we can supply 
> the html and pdf versions.
>
> We understand that three statements of use are required for OASIS 
> ratification vote.  Links to these statements are provided below:
>
> WSI: 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201001/msg00012.html 
>
> IEM: 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201001/msg00027.html 
>
> MyStateUSA: 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201001/msg00033.html 
>
>
> Please begin the ballot for Committee Specification for CAP 1.2 at 
> your earliest convenience and the OASIS-wide Standard vote as soon as 
> possible.  If there is anything additional you need, do not hesitate 
> to contact me.
>
> Elysa Jones, Chair
>
> OASIS EM-TC
> CTO Warning Systems, Inc.
> 256-880-8702 x102 office
> 256-694-8702 mobile
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>

-- 
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-898-0670


  • 3.  Re: Request for CS and OS Ballot for CAP 1.2

    Posted 01-26-2010 04:34 
    Hi Elysa,

      I believe there have been interops but they aren't noted in the statements of use. Here's the definition from the TC Process:

    "Statement of Use", with respect to a specification, is a written statement by an OASIS Organizational Member stating that it is successfully using or implementing that specification in accordance with the conformance clauses specified in Section 2.18, ***and stating whether its use included the interoperation of multiple independent implementations.***

      I'll also need the comment resolution log from the public comment period, and I don't see anything in the minutes about the TC agreeing that there were no substantive changes between the iteration submitted for public review and this new draft.

    Thanks,

    

    Mary 


    


    On Jan 25, 2010, at 7:15 PM, Elysa Jones wrote:

    Dear Mary,

    The EM-TC voted on 1/19/2010 to request a ballot for Committee Specification for CAP 1.2.  The meeting notes indicating a vote for Committee Draft, a request for CS ballot and a request to begin the OASIS Wide Standard vote can be found at http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/download.php/36003/Draft%20Meeting%20Notes%201-19-10.doc

    The document link http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/download.php/35821/CAPv1.2-CD04.doc refers to the CD04 which was voted to advance to CS and Standard in the meeting notes above.  We understand that there wont be any title changes until the CS is approved.  Once that is done, we can supply the html and pdf versions.

    We understand that three statements of use are required for OASIS ratification vote.  Links to these statements are provided below:

    WSI: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201001/msg00012.html
    IEM: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201001/msg00027.html
    MyStateUSA: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201001/msg00033.html

    Please begin the ballot for Committee Specification for CAP 1.2 at your earliest convenience and the OASIS-wide Standard vote as soon as possible.  If there is anything additional you need, do not hesitate to contact me.

    Elysa Jones, Chair

    OASIS EM-TC
    CTO Warning Systems, Inc.
    256-880-8702 x102 office
    256-694-8702 mobile




  • 4.  CAP v1.2 schema(s) issue

    Posted 01-27-2010 14:44 
    










    


    All,
    


    


    The CAP Public Review Draft 02 dated 29 September 2009 [0] contains
a schema in section 3.4.  Call this the "schema in the
document."  The document claims that Section 3 is normative, and
there is no exception noted for the schema.
    


    


    OASIS also provides that schema separately in [1] and [2]. 
Call each these identical schemata the "free-standing schema."
    


    


    Unfortunately, the schema in the document is different from the
free-standing schema.  In addition to a host of insignificant whitespace
    


    changes:
    


    


    (a) the types of the <altitude> and <ceiling> elements
are different (xs:string in the free-standing schema vs. xs:decimalstring in
the schema in the document; note that decimalstring is not part of the XML
standard schema definition); and
    


    


    (b) the <mimeType> element is optional in the schema in the
document and required in the free-standing schema
    


    


    So which schema is correct and/or normative, and
will OASIS fix this problem when CAP v1.2 moves from Public Review Draft status
to Standard status?  
    


    


    We would like to use the free-standing schema (draft), but is this
correct?
    


    


    


    [0] http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/cap/v1.2/CAP-v1.2.html
    


    [1] http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/cap/v1.2/CAP-v1.2.xsd
    


    [2] http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/cap/v1.2/pr02/CAP-v1.2-PR02.xsd
    


    


    


    Thanks,
    


    


    


    Timothy
D. Gilmore | SAIC
    


    Senior Test Engineer | ILPSG | NIMS SC |
NIMS STEP
    


    phone: 606.274.2063 | fax: 606.274.2012
    


    mobile: 606.219.7882 |
email:  
    


    P Please consider the
environment before printing this email.


  • 5.  Re: [emergency] CAP v1.2 schema(s) issue

    Posted 01-27-2010 14:52 
    My suggestion is to fix this error immediately, before it's approved as a CS. The stand-alone schema has precedence over the one printed in the spec; that doesn't mean you shouldn't fix it however. If the change is deemed substantive an errata can't be used to fix the error.

    Regards,

    Mary


    




    


    On Jan 27, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Gilmore, Timothy wrote:

    All,
    The CAP Public Review Draft 02 dated 29 September 2009 [0] contains a schema in section 3.4.  Call this the "schema in the document."  The document claims that Section 3 is normative, and there is no exception noted for the schema.
    OASIS also provides that schema separately in [1] and [2].  Call each these identical schemata the "free-standing schema."
    Unfortunately, the schema in the document is different from the free-standing schema.  In addition to a host of insignificant whitespace
    changes:
    (a) the types of the <altitude> and <ceiling> elements are different (xs:string in the free-standing schema vs. xs:decimalstring in the schema in the document; note that decimalstring is not part of the XML standard schema definition); and
    (b) the <mimeType> element is optional in the schema in the document and required in the free-standing schema
    So which schema is correct and/or normative, and will OASIS fix this problem when CAP v1.2 moves from Public Review Draft status to Standard status? 
    We would like to use the free-standing schema (draft), but is this correct?
    Thanks,
    Timothy D. Gilmore | SAIC
    Senior Test Engineer | ILPSG | NIMS SC | NIMS STEP
    phone: 606.274.2063 | fax: 606.274.2012
    mobile: 606.219.7882 | email:  
    P Please consider the environment before printing this email.



  • 6.  Re: [emergency] CAP v1.2 schema(s) issue

    Posted 01-27-2010 15:32 
    Hi,

> Unfortunately, the schema in the document is different from the
> free-standing schema.  In addition to a host of insignificant whitespace
> changes:

To be sure you are up to date, you should be using Committee Draft 04 as that is the version that will be voted on for the CS.  Yes there are differences in whitespace due to the Word document including line numbering.

> (a) the types of the


  • 7.  Re: [emergency] CAP v1.2 schema(s) issue

    Posted 01-27-2010 16:32 
    Thanks Jacob,

Cheers,
Rex

Jacob Westfall wrote:
> Hi,
>
>   
>> Unfortunately, the schema in the document is different from the
>> free-standing schema.  In addition to a host of insignificant whitespace
>> changes:
>>     
>
> To be sure you are up to date, you should be using Committee Draft 04 as that is the version that will be voted on for the CS.  Yes there are differences in whitespace due to the Word document including line numbering.
>
>   
>> (a) the types of the


  • 8.  Re: [emergency] Re: Request for CS and OS Ballot for CAP 1.2

    Posted 02-07-2010 20:32 
    
Hi Mary,

    
The meeting notes from the 2/5/10 special meeting where we agreed there
were no substantive changes in the draft being advanced can be found at

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/download.php/36292/Draft%20Meeting%20Notes%202-5-10.doc

    
The comment resolution list can be found at

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-msg/download.php/35568/CAPv1.2-PR02-IssuesList-2.xls

    
Please find updated statements of use from MyStateUSA at

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201002/msg00008.html
 and from WSI at

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201002/msg00007.html
. 

    
We await one more but anticipate it coming in within the next day or
two. 

    
Thanks,

    
Elysa Jones, Chair
    
OASIS EM-TC
    
CTO Warning Systems, Inc.


    
At 10:34 PM 1/25/2010, Mary McRae wrote:

    

    Hi Elysa,

    
  I believe there have been interops but they aren't noted in the
statements of use. Here's the definition from the TC Process:

    
"Statement of Use

    
", with respect to a specification, is a written statement by an
OASIS Organizational Member stating that it is successfully using or
implementing that specification in accordance with the conformance
clauses specified in Section 2.18, ***and
stating whether its use included the interoperation of multiple
independent implementations.***
    

    
  I'll also need the comment resolution log from the public comment
period, and I don't see anything in the minutes about the TC agreeing
that there were no substantive changes between the iteration submitted
for public review and this new draft.

    
Thanks,

    
    Mary



    
On Jan 25, 2010, at 7:15 PM, Elysa Jones wrote:

    

    Dear Mary,

    
The EM-TC voted on 1/19/2010 to request a ballot for Committee
Specification for CAP 1.2.  The meeting notes indicating a vote for
Committee Draft, a request for CS ballot and a request to begin the OASIS
Wide Standard vote can be found at

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/download.php/36003/Draft%20Meeting%20Notes%201-19-10.doc

    
The document link

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/download.php/35821/CAPv1.2-CD04.doc
 refers to the CD04 which was voted to advance to CS and Standard in the
meeting notes above.  We understand that there wont be any title
changes until the CS is approved.  Once that is done, we can supply
the html and pdf versions.

    
We understand that three statements of use are required for OASIS
ratification vote.  Links to these statements are provided
below:

    
WSI:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201001/msg00012.html
    
IEM:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201001/msg00027.html
    
MyStateUSA:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201001/msg00033.html

    
Please begin the ballot for Committee Specification for CAP 1.2 at your
earliest convenience and the OASIS-wide Standard vote as soon as
possible.  If there is anything ad”\Ãw€ë ditional you need, do not
hesitate to contact me.

    
Elysa Jones, Chair

    
OASIS EM-TC
    
CTO Warning Systems, Inc.
    
256-880-8702 x102 office
    
256-694-8702 mobile


  • 9.  Re: [emergency] Re: Request for CS and OS Ballot for CAP 1.2

    Posted 02-08-2010 19:29 
    Hi Elysa,

      I got your message - I need the three statements of use before I can start the ballot ...

    

    Mary


    


    On Feb 7, 2010, at 3:31 PM, Elysa Jones wrote:

    
Hi Mary,

    
The meeting notes from the 2/5/10 special meeting where we agreed there
were no substantive changes in the draft being advanced can be found at

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/download.php/36292/Draft%20Meeting%20Notes%202-5-10.doc

    
The comment resolution list can be found at

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-msg/download.php/35568/CAPv1.2-PR02-IssuesList-2.xls

    
Please find updated statements of use from MyStateUSA at

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201002/msg00008.html
 and from WSI at

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201002/msg00007.html
. 

    
We await one more but anticipate it coming in within the next day or
two. 

    
Thanks,

    
Elysa Jones, Chair
    
OASIS EM-TC
    
CTO Warning Systems, Inc.


    
At 10:34 PM 1/25/2010, Mary McRae wrote:

    

    Hi Elysa,

    
  I believe there have been interops but they aren't noted in the
statements of use. Here's the definition from the TC Process:

    
"Statement of Use

    
", with respect to a specification, is a written statement by an
OASIS Organizational Member stating that it is successfully using or
implementing that specification in accordance with the conformance
clauses specified in Section 2.18, ***and
stating whether its use included the interoperation of multiple
independent implementations.***
    

    
  I'll also need the comment resolution log from the public comment
period, and I don't see anything in the minutes about the TC agreeing
that there were no substantive changes between the iteration submitted
for public review and this new draft.

    
Thanks,

    
    Mary



    
On Jan 25, 2010, at 7:15 PM, Elysa Jones wrote:

    

    Dear Mary,

    
The EM-TC voted on 1/19/2010 to request a ballot for Committee
Specification for CAP 1.2.  The meeting notes indicating a vote for
Committee Draft, a request for CS ballot and a request to begin the OASIS
Wide Standard vote can be found at

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/download.php/36003/Draft%20Meeting%20Notes%201-19-10.doc

    
The document link

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/download.php/35821/CAPv1.2-CD04.doc
 refers to the CD04 which was voted to advance to CS and Standard in the
meeting notes above.  We understand that there wont be any title
changes until the CS is approved.  Once that is done, we can supply
the html and pdf versions.

    
We understand that three statements of use are required for OASIS
ratification vote.  Links to these statements are provided
below:

    
WSI:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201001/msg00012.html
    
IEM:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201001/msg00027.html
    
MyStateUSA:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201001/msg00033.html

    
Please begin the ballot for Committee Specification for CAP 1.2 at your
earliest convenience and the OASIS-wide Standard vote as soon as
possible.  If there is anything ad”\Ãw€ë ditional you need, do not
hesitate to contact me.

    
Elysa Jones, Chair

    
OASIS EM-TC
    
CTO Warning Systems, Inc.
    
256-880-8702 x102 office
    
256-694-8702 mobile



  • 10.  Re: [emergency] Re: Request for CS and OS Ballot for CAP 1.2

    Posted 02-09-2010 18:01 
    
Hi Mary, 

    
Please find the third statement of use at

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201002/msg00022.html
.

    
We would be grateful for the ballot to begin as soon as possible in hopes
for a March Standard vote.

    
Regards,
    
Elysa Jones, Chair
    
OASIS EM-TC
    
CTO Warning Systems, Inc.

    
At 01:29 PM 2/8/2010, Mary McRae wrote:

    

    Hi Elysa,

    
  I got your message - I need the three statements of use before I
can start the ballot ...

    
Mary



    
On Feb 7, 2010, at 3:31 PM, Elysa Jones wrote:

    

    Hi Mary,

    
The meeting notes from the 2/5/10 special meeting where we agreed there
were no substantive changes in the draft being advanced can be found at

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/download.php/36292/Draft%20Meeting%20Notes%202-5-10.doc

    
The comment resolution list can be found at

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-msg/download.php/35568/CAPv1.2-PR02-IssuesList-2.xls

    
Please find updated statements of use from MyStateUSA at

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201002/msg00008.html
 and from WSI at

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201002/msg00007.html
 . 

    
We await one more but anticipate it coming in within the next day or
two. 

    
Thanks,

    
Elysa Jones, Chair
    
OASIS EM-TC
    
CTO Warning Systems, Inc.


    
At 10:34 PM 1/25/2010, Mary McRae wrote:

    

    Hi Elysa,

    
  I believe there have been interops but they aren't noted in the
statements of use. Here's the definition from the TC Process:

    
"Statement of Use

    
", with respect to a specification, is a written statement by an
OASIS Organizational Member stating that it is successfully using or
implementing that specification in accordance with the conformance
clauses specified in Section 2.18,
***and stating whether its use included the interoperation of multiple
independent implementations.***
    

    
  I'll also need the comment resolution log from the public comment
period, and I don't see anything in the minutes about the TC agreeing
that there were no substantive changes between the iteration submitted
for public review and this new draft.

    
Thanks,

    
    Mary



    
On Jan 25, 2010, at 7:15 PM, Elysa Jones wrote:

    

    Dear Mary,

    
The EM-TC voted on 1/19/2010 to request a ballot for Committee
Specification for CAP 1.2.  The meeting notes indicating a vote for
Committee Draft, a request for CS ballot and a request to begin the OASIS
Wide Standard vote can be found at

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/download.php/36003/Draft%20Meeting%20Notes%201-19-10.doc

    
The document link

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/download.php/35821/CAPv1.2-CD04.doc
 refers to the CD04 which was voted to advance to CS and Standard in the
meeting notes above.  We understand that there wont be any title
changes until the CS is approved.  Once that is done, we can supply
the html and pdf versions.

    
We understand that three statements of use are required for OASIS
ratification vote.  Links to these statements are provided
below:

    
WSI:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201001/msg00012.html
    
IEM:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201001/msg00027.html
    
MyStateUSA:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/201001/msg00033.html

    
Please begin the ballot for Committee Specification for CAP 1.2 at your
earliest convenience and the OASIS-wide Standard vote as soon as
possible.  If there is anything ad”\Ãw€ë ditional you need, do not
hesitate to contact me.

    
Elysa Jones, Chair

    
OASIS EM-TC
    
CTO Warning Systems, Inc.
    
256-880-8702 x102 office
    
256-694-8702
mobile


Related Content