There have been SOAP1.1 schema[1] updated so as to a) fix errata
and b) use XML Schema REC. I might suggest that we adopt these
instead of the one I hacked together to get a parser to
accept our schema.
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Jul/0074.html
Cheers,
Chris
Arvola Chan wrote:
> Doug:
>
>
>
> I tried removing the ds, xlink, and soap namespace declarations. XML
> Authority reports lots of errors on the resulting schema, one of which is:
>
>
>
> Imported schema must have a target namespace in order to 'import'.
> Namespace information will be lost.
>
>
>
> Therefore, I don't think it is OK to remove these namespace declarations.
>
>
>
> I didn't realize that the schema in
> http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope namespace is for SOAP 1.2. In
> that case, it would be inappropriate for us to use the schema directly
> available from that location. Still, I think section 2.3.2 is
> technically incorrect, because it currently states:
>
>
>
> "
>
> The SOAP namespace:
>
> http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/
>
> resolves to a schema conforming to an early Working Draft version of the
> W3C XML Schema specification, specifically identified by the following URI:
>
> http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema
>
> "
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Arvola
>
>