OASIS Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) TC

http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/errata01/os/complete/part3-all-inclusive/langRef/base/required-cleanup.html#required-cleanup Currently: @remap Indicates the element that the contents of the <required-cleanup> element were mapped from (provides an idea about what the new intent should be). Should be (at a minimum): @remap Indicates the element that the contents of the <required-cleanup> element was mapped from (provides an idea about what the new intent should be). A more exhaustive rewrite probably is in order. -- Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)

I don’t agree with this change: contents … were is correct in my opinion.   Cheers,   E.   -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com       From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com> Date: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 10:00 PM To: DITA TC <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/errata01/os/complete/part3-all-inclusive/langRef/base/required-cleanup.html#required-cleanup Currently: @remap Indicates the element that the contents of the <required-cleanup> element were mapped from (provides an idea about what the new intent should be). Should be (at a minimum): @remap Indicates the element that the contents of the <required-cleanup> element was mapped from (provides an idea about what the new intent should be). A more exhaustive rewrite probably is in order. -- Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

If you rephrase it as “Indicates the element from which the contents of the <required-cleanup> element were mapped” then I think it becomes clearer that “contents were mapped” is the correct construction.   Unless I’m completely misreading the original, in which case its needs to be rewritten so that it can’t be misread.   Cheers,   E.     -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com       From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Eliot Kimber <ekimber@contrext.com> Date: Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 9:17 AM To: DITA TC <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: Re: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   I don’t agree with this change: contents … were is correct in my opinion.   Cheers,   E.   -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com       From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com> Date: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 10:00 PM To: DITA TC <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/errata01/os/complete/part3-all-inclusive/langRef/base/required-cleanup.html#required-cleanup Currently: @remap Indicates the element that the contents of the <required-cleanup> element were mapped from (provides an idea about what the new intent should be). Should be (at a minimum): @remap Indicates the element that the contents of the <required-cleanup> element was mapped from (provides an idea about what the new intent should be). A more exhaustive rewrite probably is in order. -- Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

The original needs to be rewritten. Technically, one needs to read it as The element ... was ... How about Indicates the element from which the content of the <required-cleanup> element was migrated. This provides authors context for determining how the migrated content should be tagged. Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype) On 8/31/2017 3:33 PM, Eliot Kimber wrote: If you rephrase it as “Indicates the element from which the contents of the <required-cleanup> element were mapped” then I think it becomes clearer that “contents were mapped” is the correct construction.   Unless I’m completely misreading the original, in which case its needs to be rewritten so that it can’t be misread.   Cheers,   E.     -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com       From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Eliot Kimber <ekimber@contrext.com> Date: Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 9:17 AM To: DITA TC <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: Re: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   I don’t agree with this change: contents … were is correct in my opinion.   Cheers,   E.   -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com       From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com> Date: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 10:00 PM To: DITA TC <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/errata01/os/complete/part3-all-inclusive/langRef/base/required-cleanup.html#required-cleanup Currently: @remap Indicates the element that the contents of the <required-cleanup> element were mapped from (provides an idea about what the new intent should be). Should be (at a minimum): @remap Indicates the element that the contents of the <required-cleanup> element was mapped from (provides an idea about what the new intent should be). A more exhaustive rewrite probably is in order. -- Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

I have no strong opinion on the DITA content of your rewrite, but grammatically speaking, the verb "was" is still paired with the subject "the content of the ..element", which, since it now says "content" instead of "contents", is now equally (analogously) as valid as the original wording.   mag     From: dita@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:dita@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Kristen James Eberlein Sent: August 31, 2017 1:12 PM To: dita@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   The original needs to be rewritten. Technically, one needs to read it as "The element ... was ..." How about "Indicates the element from which the content of the <required-cleanup> element was migrated. This provides authors context for determining how the migrated content should be tagged." Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype) On 8/31/2017 3:33 PM, Eliot Kimber wrote: If you rephrase it as “Indicates the element from which the contents of the <required-cleanup> element were mapped” then I think it becomes clearer that “contents were mapped” is the correct construction.   Unless I’m completely misreading the original, in which case its needs to be rewritten so that it can’t be misread.   Cheers,   E.     -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com       From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Eliot Kimber <ekimber@contrext.com> Date: Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 9:17 AM To: DITA TC <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: Re: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   I don’t agree with this change: contents … were is correct in my opinion.   Cheers,   E.   -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com       From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com> Date: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 10:00 PM To: DITA TC <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/errata01/os/complete/part3-all-inclusive/langRef/base/required-cleanup.html#required-cleanup Currently: @remap Indicates the element that the contents of the <required-cleanup> element were mapped from (provides an idea about what the new intent should be). Should be (at a minimum): @remap Indicates the element that the contents of the <required-cleanup> element was mapped from (provides an idea about what the new intent should be). A more exhaustive rewrite probably is in order. -- Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php   --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

I think a better phrasing would be:   Specifies the element type name of the element the <required-cleanup> element replaced (and whose content the <required-cleanup> now contains, if any).   “Indicates” vague in this context—it doesn’t specify the form of the indication. Better to be explicit and precise.   But I think the original is grammatically correct as written.   Cheers,   E.   -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com       From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com> Date: Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 3:12 PM To: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: Re: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   The original needs to be rewritten. Technically, one needs to read it as "The element ... was ..." How about "Indicates the element from which the content of the <required-cleanup> element was migrated. This provides authors context for determining how the migrated content should be tagged." Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype) On 8/31/2017 3:33 PM, Eliot Kimber wrote: If you rephrase it as “Indicates the element from which the contents of the <required-cleanup> element were mapped” then I think it becomes clearer that “contents were mapped” is the correct construction.   Unless I’m completely misreading the original, in which case its needs to be rewritten so that it can’t be misread.   Cheers,   E.     -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com       From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Eliot Kimber <ekimber@contrext.com> Date: Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 9:17 AM To: DITA TC <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: Re: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   I don’t agree with this change: contents … were is correct in my opinion.   Cheers,   E.   -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com       From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com> Date: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 10:00 PM To: DITA TC <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/errata01/os/complete/part3-all-inclusive/langRef/base/required-cleanup.html#required-cleanup Currently: @remap Indicates the element that the contents of the <required-cleanup> element were mapped from (provides an idea about what the new intent should be). Should be (at a minimum): @remap Indicates the element that the contents of the <required-cleanup> element was mapped from (provides an idea about what the new intent should be). A more exhaustive rewrite probably is in order. -- Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

I understand Eliot's phrasing here much better than I did the others. I might slightly question the need for "if any", but that could be my ignorance. Is it common to end up with required-cleanup elements resulting from a migration when the element being migrated had no content?   mag     From: dita@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:dita@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Eliot Kimber Sent: August 31, 2017 1:32 PM To: dita@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   I think a better phrasing would be:   Specifies the element type name of the element the <required-cleanup> element replaced (and whose content the <required-cleanup> now contains, if any).   “Indicates” vague in this context—it doesn’t specify the form of the indication. Better to be explicit and precise.   But I think the original is grammatically correct as written.   Cheers,   E.   -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com       From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com> Date: Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 3:12 PM To: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: Re: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   The original needs to be rewritten. Technically, one needs to read it as "The element ... was ..." How about "Indicates the element from which the content of the <required-cleanup> element was migrated. This provides authors context for determining how the migrated content should be tagged." Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype) On 8/31/2017 3:33 PM, Eliot Kimber wrote: If you rephrase it as “Indicates the element from which the contents of the <required-cleanup> element were mapped” then I think it becomes clearer that “contents were mapped” is the correct construction.   Unless I’m completely misreading the original, in which case its needs to be rewritten so that it can’t be misread.   Cheers,   E.     -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com       From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Eliot Kimber <ekimber@contrext.com> Date: Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 9:17 AM To: DITA TC <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: Re: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   I don’t agree with this change: contents … were is correct in my opinion.   Cheers,   E.   -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com       From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com> Date: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 10:00 PM To: DITA TC <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/errata01/os/complete/part3-all-inclusive/langRef/base/required-cleanup.html#required-cleanup Currently: @remap Indicates the element that the contents of the <required-cleanup> element were mapped from (provides an idea about what the new intent should be). Should be (at a minimum): @remap Indicates the element that the contents of the <required-cleanup> element was mapped from (provides an idea about what the new intent should be). A more exhaustive rewrite probably is in order. -- Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

Eliot, I think you need to cram a few more instances of the word element into the sentence -- Not. How about Provides information about the origins of the content of the <required-cleanup> element. This provides authors context for determining how the migrated content should be tagged. After all, the content did not necessary come from XML or SGML or HTML. I doubt that anyone uses this attribute; maybe it should be a candidate for removal. Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein. Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype) On 8/31/2017 4:32 PM, Eliot Kimber wrote: I think a better phrasing would be:   Specifies the element type name of the element the <required-cleanup> element replaced (and whose content the <required-cleanup> now contains, if any).   “Indicates” vague in this context—it doesn’t specify the form of the indication. Better to be explicit and precise.   But I think the original is grammatically correct as written.   Cheers,   E.   -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com       From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com> Date: Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 3:12 PM To: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: Re: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   The original needs to be rewritten. Technically, one needs to read it as The element ... was ... How about Indicates the element from which the content of the <required-cleanup> element was migrated. This provides authors context for determining how the migrated content should be tagged. Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype) On 8/31/2017 3:33 PM, Eliot Kimber wrote: If you rephrase it as “Indicates the element from which the contents of the <required-cleanup> element were mapped” then I think it becomes clearer that “contents were mapped” is the correct construction.   Unless I’m completely misreading the original, in which case its needs to be rewritten so that it can’t be misread.   Cheers,   E.     -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com       From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Eliot Kimber <ekimber@contrext.com> Date: Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 9:17 AM To: DITA TC <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: Re: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   I don’t agree with this change: contents … were is correct in my opinion.   Cheers,   E.   -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com       From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com> Date: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 10:00 PM To: DITA TC <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/errata01/os/complete/part3-all-inclusive/langRef/base/required-cleanup.html#required-cleanup Currently: @remap Indicates the element that the contents of the <required-cleanup> element were mapped from (provides an idea about what the new intent should be). Should be (at a minimum): @remap Indicates the element that the contents of the <required-cleanup> element was mapped from (provides an idea about what the new intent should be). A more exhaustive rewrite probably is in order. -- Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

I see—the value of @remap is not constrained. The example shows having replaced an element but I see that that’s not the only possible case.   In that case I like your suggested rewrite.   Cheers,   E.   -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com       From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com> Date: Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 3:59 PM To: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: Re: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   Eliot, I think you need to cram a few more instances of the word element into the sentence -- Not. How about "Provides information about the origins of the content of the <required-cleanup> element. This provides authors context for determining how the migrated content should be tagged." After all, the content did not necessary come from XML or SGML or HTML. I doubt that anyone uses this attribute; maybe it should be a candidate for removal. Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein. Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype) On 8/31/2017 4:32 PM, Eliot Kimber wrote: I think a better phrasing would be:   Specifies the element type name of the element the <required-cleanup> element replaced (and whose content the <required-cleanup> now contains, if any).   “Indicates” vague in this context—it doesn’t specify the form of the indication. Better to be explicit and precise.   But I think the original is grammatically correct as written.   Cheers,   E.   -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com       From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com> Date: Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 3:12 PM To: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: Re: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   The original needs to be rewritten. Technically, one needs to read it as "The element ... was ..." How about "Indicates the element from which the content of the <required-cleanup> element was migrated. This provides authors context for determining how the migrated content should be tagged." Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype) On 8/31/2017 3:33 PM, Eliot Kimber wrote: If you rephrase it as “Indicates the element from which the contents of the <required-cleanup> element were mapped” then I think it becomes clearer that “contents were mapped” is the correct construction.   Unless I’m completely misreading the original, in which case its needs to be rewritten so that it can’t be misread.   Cheers,   E.     -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com       From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Eliot Kimber <ekimber@contrext.com> Date: Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 9:17 AM To: DITA TC <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: Re: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   I don’t agree with this change: contents … were is correct in my opinion.   Cheers,   E.   -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com       From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com> Date: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 10:00 PM To: DITA TC <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/errata01/os/complete/part3-all-inclusive/langRef/base/required-cleanup.html#required-cleanup Currently: @remap Indicates the element that the contents of the <required-cleanup> element were mapped from (provides an idea about what the new intent should be). Should be (at a minimum): @remap Indicates the element that the contents of the <required-cleanup> element was mapped from (provides an idea about what the new intent should be). A more exhaustive rewrite probably is in order. -- Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

I concur.   mag   From: dita@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:dita@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Eliot Kimber Sent: August 31, 2017 7:18 AM To: DITA TC Subject: Re: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   I don’t agree with this change: contents … were is correct in my opinion.   Cheers,   E.   -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com       From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com> Date: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 10:00 PM To: DITA TC <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: [dita] Errata 02 item: Grammar glitch in <required-cleanup>   http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/errata01/os/complete/part3-all-inclusive/langRef/base/required-cleanup.html#required-cleanup Currently: @remap Indicates the element that the contents of the <required-cleanup> element were mapped from (provides an idea about what the new intent should be). Should be (at a minimum): @remap Indicates the element that the contents of the <required-cleanup> element was mapped from (provides an idea about what the new intent should be). A more exhaustive rewrite probably is in order. -- Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php